Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do the math on pumping 40C water any distance in a loop. It is hard to make it worth it. The water cools off and the pumping takes significant energy, plus the pump and all the piping cost something. Then using a heat pump on it makes it even worse. Low grade heat source is not a term I made up- it refers to heat sources under 100C. Even much hotter low grade heat usually goes unused. You usually need a perfect confl…
Here's an article on the subject of using waste heat from data centres and other sources for district heating. It includes the math you told me to do as well as references to other articles on the specific subject of using "low-grade heat sources" in combination with heat pumps to feed district heating networks. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212...
https://scispace.com/pdf/planning-data-center-waste-heat-re-...
And again this is a pretty idealized case-- very nearby housing, optimistic estimated costs.
Other projects analyzed in your paper had "raw" paybacks of 15 years and 17 years-- AKA never in actuality.
When we are talking about protecting the environment, efficiency and return on capital is important. You'd be better dumping those projects into generating more green energy instead of trying to reclaim the DC energy. This is why:
> > Even much hotter low grade heat usually goes unused. You usually need a perfect confluence of a warmer source, very close need for building heat, and a willingness to pay more for environmental friendliness for it all to work out.