Live data from Hacker News

AI coding at home without going broke

stephen.bochinski.dev

11–20 of 321 posts

Re: AI coding at home without going broke

#11
For me, investing in hardware seems to be the way to go.

I learned coding nearly 24 years ago and still learning new stuff all the time. At no point in time I had to rely on a subscription model to learn and do new stuff.

If LLM and agents are the default tools for coding and building software, at least for next few years, it seems like a no-brainer to invest $2000-3000 on hardware, like a Halo Strix PC.

Re: AI coding at home without going broke

#12
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> Power is not free. There's actually an interesting thought experiment here: if it takes you a full day to build something that AI would otherwise build in a day, do you end up using more power, or less? What is the break-even point, purely from a power consumption perspective?

What would you do for the rest of the day, power off your devices and go for a long bike ride?

Speaking personally: yes. That's literally what I'm planning to do this afternoon because it's noon and I'm already done with the coding tasks I had on my plate today.

Re: AI coding at home without going broke

#17
post #3

> The first is to self host. You buy the machine, run open source models locally, and pay nothing per token after that. Power is not free. What I’ve found is that you’re basically paying a premium for privacy, and that’s worth it for me.

>> Power is not free. There's actually an interesting thought experiment here: if it takes you a full day to build something that AI would otherwise build in a day, do you end up using more power, or less? What is the break-even point, purely from a power consumption perspective?

If an identical task takes a day on both sides, then the human route uses less energy, surely.

Brains are thousands or maybe even millions of times more fuel-efficient than computers and you are alive for the whole day either way, right? You probably eat about the same even.

The reason executives think AI is more efficient is that it more space efficient than a human and doesn't demand to be paid or work only a set number of hours. Everything with computing is more efficient if you resent having to give money to other humans. If they could just not have you be alive when they don't need you, it'd possibly be different.

Even though I think at a typical British freelance rate and a truly unsubsidised token price, the AI is possibly more expensive than me. And as a freelancer, from their perspective I really am not alive until they need me. (This is what it often feels like)

The reality is the human and the AI aren't used to build the same things anyway so it's a comparison you can't really make.

Re: AI coding at home without going broke

#18
post #16

I recently made an AI Agent and surprisingly coding with DeepSeek V4 Flash is quite cheap. It probably has to do with the aggressive prompt caching. I'm using OpenRouter with Novita AI as the preferred provider.

Same here, deepseek v4 flash on opencode go. It's cheap, fats and good enough to follow my instructions
Post reply on HN