So isn’t the only logical conclusion that we have reached the max of model capabilities that the US allows to be made available to the public? Why invest in smarter models with this precedent? And potentially more importantly: if a model like Mythos, which at best is an incremental improvement over Opus, is getting this treatment, how are all the AI investments that are based on the expectation of ASI / AGI / signifi…
Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
781–790 of 1001 posts
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#782Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#783I’m looking for that news article in the next weeks…
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#784Did Anthropic, unlike Open AI, forget to offer free equity to the government? “Thats a pretty nice IPO you got there… it would be a shame if something happened to it.”
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#785Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#786First, Anthropic was founded by people who we know were worried about AI safety and signs point to that still being the case. It's really cynical to say it was all an exaggeration for marketing.
Second, this isn't Moller promising a fantastic working flying car next year. The model did what Anthropic said it could do.
I realise that ruling out "they bought Anthropic's scaremongering" brings up the question of why the government would block Mythos/Fable, but not the roughly-as-capable and less restricted GPT5.5. However we do know for a fact that they dislike Anthropic more than OpenAI right now.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#787Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#788A company with different taste would redo that apple ad from the Power Mac era: “this model has been classified a munition”. https://youtu.be/l2ThMmgQdpE
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#789If I were Dario Amodei, I would start relocating Anthropic to the EU, where there's a huge interest in supporting domestic AI. Also, EU politics are so fragmented that a suspension like this one would be very hard to be agreed. Yann LeCun got that right with AMI Labs.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#790Their other models are having a rough time of it, too: https://honeypot.net/2026/06/12/anthropics-leaning-in-to-the... I wonder if they pulled Fable because it had too high of a “dangerous session” count. If so, I wonder if they’ve considered that their “dangerous session” detector has lost its damn mind this week. (BTW, that screenshot is 100% real. I was walking to work this morning and a random song played. I had…