Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#2> ... this reality only further cements our position that frontier artificial intelligence ought to be accessible to everyone, rather than concentrated in the hands of a select few frontier labs, ourselves included.
> To that end, every single model we’ve released has, from day one, been available for air-gapped self-hosting. We have no plans on changing that. In fact, we’ve doubled down on AI sovereignty, ...
Extremely commendable.
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#3> ... this reality only further cements our position that frontier artificial intelligence ought to be accessible to everyone, rather than concentrated in the hands of a select few frontier labs, ourselves included. > To that end, every single model we’ve released has, from day one, been available for air-gapped self-hosting. We have no plans on changing that. In fact, we’ve doubled down on AI sovereignty, ... Extrem…
Great response.
Good thing about LLMs is that they can't put the genie back in the bottle, and long after OpenAI and Anthropic bite the dust (not wishing that but just saying given their trajectories), there will continue to be people, engineers and startups working on open source LLMs.
My hope is that we're able to somehow repurpose all of the GPU chiplets currently sitting in warehouses and in massive datacenters for broader consumer, academic, educational and non-profit consumption. It will create such great value and ripple effect creating and spreading hardware + computing literacy far and wide. Ugh, hope that happens.
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#4[dead]
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#5[deleted]
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#6[flagged]
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#7Sounds nice except that these are 1 very small scale model, 1 reranker, and 1 embedding model that are far from frontier LLM level. And they're not open sourced.
As much as I agree with the message, this reads like marketing copy trying to make a big deal out of a tiny model being hosted privately.
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#8[flagged]
While I agree most LLM use is counterproductive, they're pretty useful in scenarios where you can quickly verify their outputs.
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#9[flagged]
An LLM can absolutely center a div and then use a browser MCP or playwright to visually validate that it was centered.
Re: Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#10What if there's export control order for AWS services one day? Or cloud services in general?