That's annoying. I shelled out a pretty penny specifically to try out Fable, but if I'm only going to get to use it for 2 days...
Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
411–420 of 1001 posts
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#412This is the kind of supply risk everyone should plan for. Depending exclusively on one country, one provider, or one model is not going to cut it anymore. I'd double down on improving opensource local models even more and getting harnesses, routers, and testing right.
The Trump administration should focus on things like the UFC fight etc.
This also looks like the perfect China shaped gap in the market if there ever was one.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#413Same day as the SpaceX IPO
Feudals doing backroom deals.
SpaceX IPO + https://x.ai/news/anthropic-compute-partnership
Anthropic rents the entire Colossus 1 data center and other compute capacity from SpaceX, which acquired xAI. Under the agreement, Anthropic pays SpaceX $1.25 billion a month, totaling roughly $45 billion for a multi-year leaseRe: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#414Man, Opus 4.8 is feeling a lot smarter in the last few interactions. Is Anthropic silently serving Fable as Opus just to stick it to the man?
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#415> If this standard was applied across the industry, we believe it would essentially halt all new model deployments for all frontier model providers. Good. 4.8 is good enough.
I felt this way about Sonnet 4.5 too, but it would be hard to go back to it now.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#416This heralds the end of frontier model development in the US since the same national security argument can and will be made against any model stronger than Fable/Mythos. Squashing the ability of Anthropic and OpenAI to deploy newer stronger models will destroy their valuation so no trillion dollar IPOs either. Low cost Chinese models will soon catch up to Opus and GPT-5.5 eroding Anthropic and OpenAI's ability to charge more. The knock on effects of this are just beginning.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#417In my head: The conversation politicians are having with other AI CEOs!
"How dare you release this model to poor people? This belongs only with the ultra-rich!"
They can say whatever they want... but I just have this gut feeling that this is part of it.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#418“Uncle Sam, these new AI are dangerous. We really need legislation to stop irresponsible use of AI.” “OK, Dario. Let’s start with you.” “No! I meant regulations for other people!”
This is not legislation.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#419[dead]
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#420IMO this is a bigger deal than everyone realizes.
If Fable 5/Mythos 5 are considered dangerous enough to invoke export controls on then future models are almost guaranteed to trigger the same process. Locking them down to US citizens is _very_ interesting. I don't think any tech company so far tracks licenses attached to citizenship.