Live data from Hacker News

Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

anthropic.com

371–380 of 1001 posts

Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

#372

It might have been starting to become more clear from this one X-post. https://xunroll.com/thread/2064776322979676227 Using combinations of jailbreaking-techniques including: writing cyrillic helped a lot to disarm the filter.

This is kind of extraordinary when you think about what could actually be obtained. This makes it seem somewhat reasonable to implement export controls to me - still not happy about it though

Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

#373
post #44

For large corporates and other entities of any size, the threat of the core of your infrastructure getting suddenly disabled because of something like this is going to be untenable. I predict the pressures for on-prem, offline access (whether by licensing weights or getting them in a restricted setting like TEE/CC) will be overwhelming and one the players will fill the need.

Or abstract i.e. openrouter, that reduces the risk vector to "all implementations have been simultaneously banned".

If a government entity bans a LLM provider due to a jailbreak concern, they can also ban an on-prem solution under the same guise. The jailbreak risk exists regardless of where it's hosted. You could defensibly argue the on-prem risk is higher since frontier model companies can justify safety spend due to their size, it's more difficult to combat bad actors if you're company is the only one using the model and you don't have economies of scale.

Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

#374
It all started when they took a stand against DoD on autonomous weapons and domestic mass surveillance usage. Feb 2026.

After that details don't matter, they've shown their "enemy" colours, once is enough. This is just punishment and it will continue, until they bend the knee.

Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

#375
post #78

Part of me thinks fault lies with Anthropic for scaremongering, part has zero faith in the current administration especially after the "supply chain risk" designation. It may be safer to just move the company to Canada.

Yes, I'm surprised there isn't more conversation around this being a way of the administration lashing out at Anthropic like they tried to do with the supply chain risk maneuver.

Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

#376

I'm more interested in the business impact of this So you spend billions of dollars training the model, only for it to be used in the US. Then interesting to see where most of anthropic revenue comes from. If it's the US then they're fine but if it's global then they'll see a drop in revenue? Then add to this decision, companies are going to significantly reduce their token spend. So what does all of this mean for th…

I am certain this is hype. Tomorrow, they can release Opus 4.9 and claim it is 99.99% close to Fable.

Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

#377
post #113

Listen - that's the sound of millions of companies and users doubling down on Chinese models. It might be a national security problem for other nations to have access to these models. But it's equally now a national security problem for any other nation to depend on them. Or US tech in general.

You are drinking the cool aid if you think the CCP is going to let the world get ahead of China using CCP models.

Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

#378
post #81

Not allowing it to be used by any foreign national, from any country, even if they are located in the United States or an employee of Anthropic, seems overly broad and harsh. And all because of a seemingly minor potential jailbreak exploit. There’s something that doesn’t quite meet the eye here.

It's because the hammer they've used is export controls which deals with FN access. It's particularly nasty and can ramp up to "if you're born in China even if you spent the second and every day since then in the usa and have us citizenship, you're not allowed to see this information"
Post reply on HN