This is exactly what Dario asked for in his last blog post. So even though this is clearly stupid, I just can bring myself to feel sorry for Anthropic.
Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
171–180 of 1001 posts
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#172> The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. How will this be implemented/ve…
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#173So isn’t the only logical conclusion that we have reached the max of model capabilities that the US allows to be made available to the public? Why invest in smarter models with this precedent? And potentially more importantly: if a model like Mythos, which at best is an incremental improvement over Opus, is getting this treatment, how are all the AI investments that are based on the expectation of ASI / AGI / signifi…
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#174Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#175Listen - that's the sound of millions of companies and users doubling down on Chinese models. It might be a national security problem for other nations to have access to these models. But it's equally now a national security problem for any other nation to depend on them. Or US tech in general.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#176So isn’t the only logical conclusion that we have reached the max of model capabilities that the US allows to be made available to the public? Why invest in smarter models with this precedent? And potentially more importantly: if a model like Mythos, which at best is an incremental improvement over Opus, is getting this treatment, how are all the AI investments that are based on the expectation of ASI / AGI / signifi…
ChatGPT 2 was once too powerful to release.
AI has been moving faster than culture and thinking around it. Once we've adapted to what these models can do we'll relax a little, and then a new stepwise improvement will start it all over again. It always goes this way.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#177It says this happened at 5:21 EST today… The page showed June 11, 2026 and has now been updated to June 12, 2026 in the last 10m. https://imgur.com/a/lx7HCW9 Edit: Google mislabels crawl dates clearly my bad
That's the release blog post. Google is likely pulling the snippet from the Related Content section at the bottom, which includes the post about the US government directive.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#178By thinking for ourselves and writing the code with the keyboard.
Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#179Re: Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
#180So isn’t the only logical conclusion that we have reached the max of model capabilities that the US allows to be made available to the public? Why invest in smarter models with this precedent? And potentially more importantly: if a model like Mythos, which at best is an incremental improvement over Opus, is getting this treatment, how are all the AI investments that are based on the expectation of ASI / AGI / signifi…
What an unbelievable claim. Especially since the vast majority of publicly available benchmarks disagree.