Live data from Hacker News

"Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

correresmidestino.com

51–60 of 408 posts

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#51
post #28

All I got out of this article is that he should have went home and dumped it into chatgpt just to see what happened; then if it did as good a job as him, he should start looking for other places he can add value that AI can't.

she did. Did you remember to read the article?

From the phrasing of the sentence, with the incorrect gender and the generic nature of the comment, obviously not.

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#52
post #14

An honest to god article full of em dashes that's not because it was AI but because it was a human using them as a crutch to get around crafting sentences that flow naturally. Almost brings a tear to my eye.

My first rule—before doing anything else—when writing a sentence, is to check whether I could have removed the em dashes by re-ordering the elements.

Update: in case it’s not obvious, I am sorry. I could not help it.

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#53

wrt. the end of the story, it will be interesting to see if people start noticing their Dunning-Kruger bias as a result of LLMs. Specifically: LLMs make it really easy to misunderestimate the complexity of fields other than your own. (You can see this with a lot of vibecoded projects, for example – once they hit the wall of complexity, they stall out or start finding ugly patches for fundamental design issues, etc.)…

Agreed. LLMs are really terrific at sounding like they know exactly what they are talking about. Fable is the best yet. Beautiful, thorough explanations with absolute certainty, which under even light scrutiny turn out to be mostly bullshit.

I still love the tool, but remain as convinced as ever that AGI does not lie at the end of this particular path.

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#54
post #28

All I got out of this article is that he should have went home and dumped it into chatgpt just to see what happened; then if it did as good a job as him, he should start looking for other places he can add value that AI can't.

she did. Did you remember to read the article?

The article does not say that. The author doesn't take the text the other person dumped into ChatGPT and evaluate its quality. That is what OP is referring to.

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#55
post #14

An honest to god article full of em dashes that's not because it was AI but because it was a human using them as a crutch to get around crafting sentences that flow naturally. Almost brings a tear to my eye.

My writing used to be littered with them, but I now eschew the em in favour of en, as it has become too strong an anti-shibboleth.

I have also taken to being sloppier in my prose, as I’ve had stories rejected for being “written by AI” - when they’re shorts I wrote more than a decade ago. Reworked them to sound like a moron, accepted. Sigh.

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#56
post #9

I have no doubt that the writer is better at translating than AI, but I have to say that AI translation has gotten so good that I'm not sure how much longer translation work will be there, or rather it might end up being more about auditing. For example, I just read the Lawrence Ellsworth translation of The Three Musketeers, which I very thoroughly enjoyed. I don't speak or read French, but from my understanding Ells…

This moment is coming for software developers too

I think this collapses a global, complex heirarchy of software engineering workers into a single monolith and serves only to advertise for frontier LLM providers. the point where you no longer need engineers is not going to be reached by making LLMs better and better.

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#57

    AI isn’t replacing me. Like a toddler, it
    needs to be constantly coached.
Like a toddler, it will grow up.

Humans are really bad at noticing trajectories. They see the current situation. They know what the situation was 5 years ago. But for some reason they do not believe that there is a trajectory. They view the present state as the final destination.

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#58
post #9

I have no doubt that the writer is better at translating than AI, but I have to say that AI translation has gotten so good that I'm not sure how much longer translation work will be there, or rather it might end up being more about auditing. For example, I just read the Lawrence Ellsworth translation of The Three Musketeers, which I very thoroughly enjoyed. I don't speak or read French, but from my understanding Ells…

> Out of curiosity, I sic'd Claude Fable on the original French version of The Three Musketeers and told it to translate accurately, but also try and keep the same jovial tone as the original and do not censor anything. After it was done, I didn't read the entire output, but I did compare a few individual chapters between the Ellsworth translation and the Fable translation. This isn’t a great test, because Claude alm…

Read the last two paragraphs :)

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#59
post #39
post #9

I have no doubt that the writer is better at translating than AI, but I have to say that AI translation has gotten so good that I'm not sure how much longer translation work will be there, or rather it might end up being more about auditing. For example, I just read the Lawrence Ellsworth translation of The Three Musketeers, which I very thoroughly enjoyed. I don't speak or read French, but from my understanding Ells…

> I did compare a few individual chapters between the Ellsworth translation and the Fable translation. I'm pretty sure the Ellsworth translation is in the corpus. You basically instructed claude to regurgitate it. The llms all have the more famous books memorized. You can trick them to recite them more or less word for word.

I mentioned this specifically in my comment :)

Re: "Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

#60
post #5

I think it's an interesting perspective, because translation is one of the jobs that I (a) hear is the first to lose work due to AI, and (b) often used as an example of "acceptable" AI by people who are skeptics of LLMs and AI-generated art.

"Could not connect to translation service" was apparently good enough for someone, so the bar must be extremely low.

https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/3e786n/chinese_hair_...

On the other hand, a lot of people become extremely put off by the smallest sign of ai slop. And the llms have a tendency to impart their style to any text they touch.

Post reply on HN