Live data from Hacker News

Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

envs.net

1–10 of 147 posts

Re: Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

#2
I think this says more about "modern" UI than it does about AI slop. The awfulness of all this comes mostly from the fact that widgets no longer have consistent shape, theme or interaction behaviour ever since desktop paridigms and original Xerox/Parc research were abandoned in favour of web slop. So yeah, this is much more Web Slop than AI Slop. AI is just amplifying it.

Re: Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

#3
post #2

I think this says more about "modern" UI than it does about AI slop. The awfulness of all this comes mostly from the fact that widgets no longer have consistent shape, theme or interaction behaviour ever since desktop paridigms and original Xerox/Parc research were abandoned in favour of web slop. So yeah, this is much more Web Slop than AI Slop. AI is just amplifying it.

Continuing in that vein, it'd be interesting to see a Win98 version.

Edit: https://retr0.id/stuff/deslop/

Re: Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

#4
Qt is heavily represented in training data. Qt has existed for decades and the model has likely seen Qt tutorials, screenshots, source code, discussions, etc. As a result, "Qt application" is a highly coherent concept in the latent space. "Qt app" is almost like a named distribution.

Re: Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

#8
I've been doing this recently - working with Qt on a local app.

I've had good luck providing a png "design board" with all of the template colors and having the first task be to build out a design gallery with all of the ui widget. Then have the design docs specify which component to use. Ensure that the documents specify to only use pre-existing components and have a list of each component and their intended use cases.

Of course, this learning came after seeing how awful V1 of the app was. Initially, it looked really impressive, but once you started clicking around it became obvious how incoherent the design was.

Claude's new frontend-design plugin is solid for web apps in my testing. My wife and I have been using it to build her an app and her discerning design eye is largely impressed with what it's done.

Re: Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

#9
post #5

as someone with little to no design background they all look the same to me except the bloated sass which is clearly inferior is there a way to quantifiably measure how much better one design would be from another?

This article is purely subjective. I'm sure there are some academics that could explain ways to objectively score usability but this article is purely subjective.

Re: Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

#10
post #5

as someone with little to no design background they all look the same to me except the bloated sass which is clearly inferior is there a way to quantifiably measure how much better one design would be from another?

No. It's completely subjective.

The whole "AI slop" noise is, at its core, human slop. It is people applying a hopefully pejorative label, trying to appeal to other slop aficionados that like whatever the current trendy slur is, in an objectively undefinable way.

In this case this guy likes the way Qt apps, they think it looks better, but it isn't a big trick they are revealing: They made it conform to the style they like, but this doesn't translate to anyone else in any measurable way. I think web apps looking like Qt apps feel like the late 90s and it's just weird, but my taste also is entirely subjective and mine alone.

Post reply on HN