Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't the whole point of a better model that it should be better at understanding you than the previous one? So the same prompt should return a better answer. Prompting differently to the new model seems entirely backwards when trying to determine if the model has improved.
It doesn't matter how good the models get, they still won't be able to act on unclear directions. Learning to provide unambiguous, clear directions is a skill. A lot of people who report bad experiences with models aren't yet good at that skill. More importantly though, the key to successful communication is having a good understanding of what the other side of the conversation already knows and understands. Saying "…
Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
481–490 of 748 posts
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#482I continue to feel validated in my refusal to use terminal-based LLMs on my local machine. Even if they don't do anything malicious, there are just too many things they can screw up that can cause me to lose a non-trivial amount of work and/or my machine and therefore ability to work.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#483Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is exactly right. By offloading this trivial task to the LLM, Simon has abandoned the opportunity to evaluate the abstraction with additional information and improve it. Instead, we let the agent spend $12 and make the fix while learning nothing.
Things I learned from this: - Fable will do a whole lot more than you might expect in order to verify a fix. I learned that it's "relentlessly proactive". That's a good title for a blog entry! - You can take screenshots of a window in macOS using the "screencapture" CLI command, but you'll need the integer window ID first. - That windowID is accessible via "Quartz.CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo(Quartz.kCGWindowListOption…
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#484> When I came back a few minutes later I saw my machine open a browser window in my regular Firefox and then navigate to the dialog in question. I had not told Claude Code to use any browser automation, and I was pretty sure it wasn’t possible for it to trigger mouse movements or keyboard shortcuts within a window, so how was it doing that? I continue to feel validated in my refusal to use terminal-based LLMs on my l…
Shouldn't this be relatively easy for a $1T company to set up?
Isn't this trivial compared to the entire harness?
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#485Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> he would have learned nothing about the AI there is absolutely zero value in spending time to learn about new models as in few months new model will be out and whatever you learned about the current one will be useless. Also with models getting better and better you have to know less and less to achieve same results.
There’s zero value? Surely you don’t believe zero, it’s potentially the most powerful predictive AI in the world ever made? Maybe only incremental steps sure. But also their IPO is coming, you don’t want people evaluating them beforehand?
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#486Earlier quoted context omitted.
Things I learned from this: - Fable will do a whole lot more than you might expect in order to verify a fix. I learned that it's "relentlessly proactive". That's a good title for a blog entry! - You can take screenshots of a window in macOS using the "screencapture" CLI command, but you'll need the integer window ID first. - That windowID is accessible via "Quartz.CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo(Quartz.kCGWindowListOption…
And Fable is still worse than Codex. I use both and the only thing (as always) that I will use Claude for is UI design. Opus 4.8 and now Fable are still both worse at actually getting the job done than the Codex model. Claude models write FAR too much code when it's not needed, they burn far too many tokens, when they are not needed, write un-necessary tests, write plans which are 5 pages longer than are needed, etc.…
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#487This to me reads like a poignant commentary on the catastrophic loss of human agency, with the actual commit being highly revealing [0]. Author wants to hide a horizontal scrollbar. Any junior frontend dev worth their salt will be asking right away "where do I stick `overflow-x: hidden;`?" A complete solution will then require hitting "Inspect element" in the browser to find the CSS class and running (rip)grep to fin…
This is exactly right. By offloading this trivial task to the LLM, Simon has abandoned the opportunity to evaluate the abstraction with additional information and improve it. Instead, we let the agent spend $12 and make the fix while learning nothing.
For $12 implied cost, he got a front-page post on HN with 500 comments. What is that worth? :-)
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#488I ... tell it exactly what I know needs to be done and then ... read the code that comes out and ... ask for some changes, then hand-code some modifications to the silly useEffects and bad ORM queries.
This new feature is going to unlock several large customers because they need a particular workflow. The return on investment for a my time and a $20/month subscription will be pretty respectable.
I'm not sure why I need to spend $5 on a single ask for a new `/base/new-feature` to our app with a mostly-boilerplate CRUD interface.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#489Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's like saying you can learn so much about math from using SymPy to solve equations. Yes, you probably can. If you pay close attention to what is happening and can integrate the techniques being used into your knowledge. But your learnings here are what, a handful of hacks? For most people it's like being shown the chain rule (which frankly, is more general than any of these learnings) without knowing what a deriva…
> I think people with a rosy view about this are severely undercounting the problems associated with the trust relationship between a person and an LLM and what that means. Personally I think the impact of LLMs on children's education is a crisis right now. Kids are not going to learn to write if an LLM writes their essays for them. And writing is how you learn to think.
There's also reading. A lot of reading can substitute some writing.
EDIT: Actually, I'd say that at first you need to do a lot of reading and _then_ writing can help your thinking as well.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#490> When I came back a few minutes later I saw my machine open a browser window in my regular Firefox and then navigate to the dialog in question. I had not told Claude Code to use any browser automation, and I was pretty sure it wasn’t possible for it to trigger mouse movements or keyboard shortcuts within a window, so how was it doing that? I continue to feel validated in my refusal to use terminal-based LLMs on my l…
I'm shocked they don't come with a way to run them in a sandbox. Shouldn't this be relatively easy for a $1T company to set up? Isn't this trivial compared to the entire harness?