Earlier quoted context omitted.
It wasn't a competition though just mutual incompatibility: aliens so alien that we can barely comprehend their motives and are implicitly regarded as hostile by our manner of existence. I'd say the case it was making has only become more relevant with the chatbot age.
> I'd say the case it was making has only become more relevant with the chatbot age. Exactly. The central thesis, consciousness not being necessary for intelligence, is very relevant today. Of course, the existential horror background in the book was also quite well done.
Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)
61–67 of 67 posts
Re: Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)
#62Peter Watts Amazon "About the Author". > https://www.amazon.com.au/stores/author/B001H6Q2TE/about > This is awkward and a little creepy. They tell me I have to do it for promotional purposes, but I've already got a blog. I've already got a website. Being told that setting up an author page on fcuking Amazon is essential to success? A company that treats us all like such goddamn children it doesn't even allow us to co…
> A company that treats us all like such goddamn children it doesn't even allow us to correctly spell an epithet with a venerable history going back 900 years or more? This meant what?
> information above is fucked. For example
I imagine at some point writing "fucking" was rebuffed, or maybe you can write "fucked" but not "fucking", or there was some time between those paragraphs.
Re: Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chimp isn't, but at the end of freeze frame Sunday addresses one who she thinks is. [Not sure if that was the original intent in this thread, though]
Hmm. I don't remember that, maybe it's time for a re-read.
2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence, the "I" in "It" is slightly different. 5th paragraph, 2nd sentence, the "s" in "space" is likewise. Then in the next chapter, there's an "e" in "every" and later another "e" in "eye".
And as you spell it out (and in some editions), it ends with...
"I see you found my eighth-notes."
Re: Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
I quite enjoyed Blindsight, but that was not my takeaway at all :P How do you see people differently after reading it?
Hard to pin into words! We're unconscious of how unconscious we are?, and it's good to… what's the term, suffer gladly and give gladly? To own one's unconsciousness and raise it, and expect and see others' unconscious going about major things in life - to see it coldly as well as warmly. I find this is more accurate and safer than assuming consciousness in everyone, and it also reveals so clearly people who do cast t…
Re: Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)
#65Re: Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm. I don't remember that, maybe it's time for a re-read.
I'm looking at my kindle version here... 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence, the "I" in "It" is slightly different. 5th paragraph, 2nd sentence, the "s" in "space" is likewise. Then in the next chapter, there's an "e" in "every" and later another "e" in "eye". And as you spell it out (and in some editions), it ends with... "I see you found my eighth-notes."
Re: Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm looking at my kindle version here... 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence, the "I" in "It" is slightly different. 5th paragraph, 2nd sentence, the "s" in "space" is likewise. Then in the next chapter, there's an "e" in "every" and later another "e" in "eye". And as you spell it out (and in some editions), it ends with... "I see you found my eighth-notes."
Nah, that's different