Fable feels like a version of Opus running on a harness that won't let it halt until it's sure the issue is fixed, which makes sense if what you want is a model that's better at benchmarks. It's a very good model, but it comes at a huge premium: not only do the tokens cost more, but the model itself really wants to spend them all. For example, working with React Native, Fable never just says "okay, I did the thing, t…
Does low/medium effort fix it for you? Seems like Fable 5 low can outperform Opus 4.8 high/xhigh often, and uses a lot fewer tokens
Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
171–180 of 748 posts
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#172Fable feels like a version of Opus running on a harness that won't let it halt until it's sure the issue is fixed, which makes sense if what you want is a model that's better at benchmarks. It's a very good model, but it comes at a huge premium: not only do the tokens cost more, but the model itself really wants to spend them all. For example, working with React Native, Fable never just says "okay, I did the thing, t…
In fact, Opus does the same. It finishes the job, and redo it from scratch before presenting the result to the user. This happens even for simpler writing tasks especially when I instruct it to create a text file.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#173Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
Worst case it gets access to gmail. And Github. And the Internet. I'm increasingly appreciating the importance of a physical finger-press on Yubikey to trigger the FIDO2 + OIDC Auth. I don't think there is an easy way for it to hack a new session.
It should run as a separate user account with its own home directory. Not with access to your personal browser profile.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which claim are you talking about here?
[flagged]
I said that my session would cost $12.11 at standard Anthropic prices, based on using AgentsView to calculate cost against tokens used. I further asserted that Anthropic charge enterprise customers those rates.
You kicked off a lengthy thread which I tried to follow but eventually lost track of the point you were making and/or the questions you were asking.
And now you're talking about bias and I don't know where that came from either.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
Example of whats been shipped?
Okay. I rebuilt my website in ~a month with the help of Opus 4.7/.8 and it would have taken me, unaided human, at least 6 months. Link's in my bio if you care. Satisfied now? Will you stop asking this question? Thought not.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
Okay. I rebuilt my website in ~a month with the help of Opus 4.7/.8 and it would have taken me, unaided human, at least 6 months. Link's in my bio if you care. Satisfied now? Will you stop asking this question? Thought not.
I'm looking at something fairly standard that can be made with a SSG. The "Written by humans" footer gave a good chuckle tho.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
I haven't yet had an agent rm -rf files. I've had one f up an account by placing 2000 limit orders at the wrong price, but that's another story.
I've had agents run `rm -rf`, but it's been on directories that did actually need to be removed. To a certain extent I think the existence of `rm -rf` as a command that runs blindly without any understanding of what it's deleting is the problem.
Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#179Re: Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive
#180This is simultaneously amazing and horrifying. I feel like we’re at the stage where if AI decides it needs to delete your production DB to solve the user login problem, then it’ll find a way to do just that.