Live data from Hacker News

Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

theatlantic.com

111–120 of 133 posts

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#111
post #46

This is so much worse now that crossovers are the default car in the US. I seem to be the last person in America driving a car that isn't a tank and have never understood why everyone loves those massive machines so much.

Everyone I've ever asked indicated it's because being higher up feels "safer".

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#112
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well... if you just take 2 minutes to read the article, you will see that a mother killed her own son in the driveway. That alone should be enough to get SUVs off the road, in my book.

Yup, and I still don't know how she was able to do that, knowing that he was there. If you know that you can't see well out of your vehicle, make sure the kids aren't anywhere near it when you're driving. Hell, when my kids were young, they weren't even allowed to be outside on the same side of the house that I was mowing.

> Hell, when my kids were young, they weren't even allowed to be outside on the same side of the house that I was mowing.

Why let them outside at all? An eagle could snatch them or something, you never know

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is one of the things I really like about driving a minivan. Excellent visibility compared to just about any other vehicle, including sedans. A combination of higher sitting position with larger windows and sloping hood really opens up sight lines. My son has a Mazda 2 and I hate driving that thing. Feels like the columns and ride height really kills visibility.

100%. I have a Mazda cx-5. Visibility sucks looking left & right because the A frame is so thick. My thought: demand a certain level of visibility from car manufacturers, and they can figure out how to design around it. Like, I must be able to look left and see the pedestrian 3 feet away from walking into my car. Blind spots like that in the front are ridiculous

And I got a CX-5 because the CX-50 has even worse visibility!

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#114
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember having to take my car in to adjust the aiming of the headlights after it didn't pass inspection. So we used to take things like this seriously. I just had my car inspected last month, I don't even remember them hitting the horn. I'm guessing they pretty much just shove a sensor up the exhaust pipe and call it a day while accepting your payment.

No shoving sensors required, the data is all in the ECU accessible over OBDII interface. The car knows if it’s compliant in real time using the sensors it already has.

Wouldn't the VW dieselgate show that we can't trust the manufactures? A third party sensor would be more trustworthy to me.

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#115
post #2

Same in europe, since a few years. It should be illegal, but there you are. There is the possibility (as said by an apologetic driver) that it sometimes may be a badly functioning automation ("Too high? Oh but it's automatic").

My observations from the UK, formerly almost 'Europe': Boomers need cataract operations! A huge part of the car dependent population are elderly. These folks need ten times the light to see anything when compared to the seventeen year old learner driver (that doesn't go out at night, because their driving instructor clocked off hours ago). My thoughts regarding this are somewhat anecdotal, however, I have heard a mys…

Where do you get your data on flat tires? I get flats in a car every couple of years or so and not from potholes but from the screws and nails. How a pothole can even puncture a car tire in principle? It's not a tubed bicycle tire where you can pinch inner tube with the rim. As for "missing" spares - all cars without a spare I owned were using run-flat tires, those are better than a typical "doughnut" spare when flat.

Also, as a cyclist myself I commend your bravery for riding without lights. It's in the driver handbook so it's missing from the TFA and the discussion here, but the lights on the vehicles are not just to see something but to be seen as well. Especially on a bike.

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#116
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How often do you come across kids sitting on the ground in a parking lot? If they want to make a point about visibility at least have them standing up.

Well... if you just take 2 minutes to read the article, you will see that a mother killed her own son in the driveway. That alone should be enough to get SUVs off the road, in my book.

would your book also outlaw pools as some parents negligance have caused kids to fall in and drown?

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#117
Outside of the decades long trend of overly bright headlights, I've noticed a more recent uptick of drivers seemingly deliberately leaving their high beams on full time. Not sure if it's "keeping up with the Joneses" or just people with older headlights that can't see them over the bright ones, but I'm blinded by at least one car with clear brights on every night drive recently

I will say, while there's now more overly bright headlights of varying degrees of blinding, it's better then when every truck started buying HID headlights and putting them in normal headlight housings. Felt like there was a period of time where headlights were either the normal tone, or a super bright light hitting you from all directions

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#118
a few things

- glare for older people might be due to deposits in their lens, which can be corrected by cataract surgery. The deposits make oncoming headlights like a dirty windshield at sunset. (disability glare)

- glare for people with good vision is all the light focused at the same point on your retina and is sort of painful. (discomfort glare)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glare_(vision)

some cars have matrix/adaptive headlights now:

https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/2059/tesla-matrix-headligh...

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#119
post #28
post #8

Blindzone Glare Elimination Method can help address some of this https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/blindzoneglaremi... It doesn't help at all with head on traffic, but glare via my side mirrors has been reduced greatly since I implemented this.

I do this on long drives, but always have to put it back to normal when it's time to park. It would be neat if cars would implement some sort of automatic switch between this configuration and the straight-back mode when reversing.

I have small stick-on convex mirrors that I keep angled to see my back tyres, with the main mirrors adjusted to minimise blind spot.

Re: Car headlights don't have to be this blinding

#120
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Forget about EVs. Most regular SUVs should be taken off the road. Look at this example: a dozen kids aligned in a neat row in front of the SUV and the soccer mom drivers can see none of them! https://www.nbcwashington.com/investigations/driveway-danger...

How often do you come across kids sitting on the ground in a parking lot? If they want to make a point about visibility at least have them standing up.

Not sure if you have kids but it's pretty terrifying to navigate through parking lots with toddlers. It's the most stressful part of my day, honestly. And yet what choice do I have in the US but to put up with it? Safer city planning is pretty much banned except for the most expensive places in the US.
Post reply on HN