Live data from Hacker News

A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

404media.co

411–420 of 574 posts

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#411
post #350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We can right these wrongs. Vertical cooling seems feasible. A Google Maps 3D tour of the interior would be much more accessible. You’re not anti-accessibility, right? This is a moral imperative. Thank you for pointing this out.

The cooling towers are right there.

It’s true. All we have to do is figure out how much money it will take to steamroll the area backwards NIMBY dumb dumbs that don’t understand how much more societally beneficial this is, and how much more important our vision and shareholder stakes are.

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#412
post #368
post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is the French government more responsive than those of neighbouring countries?

Probably because we have a well established history of regularly changing regimes. Since we overthrew royalty in 1789 we've had five republics, two empires, three monarchies and a bunch of short-lived totalitarian regimes, coups and other major political events. If anything, the longevity of the Fifth Republic is starting to become unusual (only the Third Republic and the Ancien Régime have lasted longer). Maybe we'r…

I don’t think that addresses my question.

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Only because the people don't fight back. If they know that folks would fight back, they would behave themselves in the most polite and proper ways you won't believe.

It's rarely acknowledged but a big reason why ATF and FBI toned things down after Waco is because McVeigh (he was there watching) directly retaliated causing nearly 1000 casualties of government employees. At that point they went to the current plan of just divide and conquer a single person at a time via surveillance of the targeted group after things quiet down rather than try to take on groups head on.

Yep, you can see it in the way ICE operates. 10 agents jump out of several cars, they grab one helpless person and they all drive away. Like a pack of hyenas picking off a young calf.

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#414
post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know how effective the French protests are, since I haven't lived in Europe for a while. But even as a Swiss, at least judging from TV, protests in the U.S. generally seem very tame. Not advocating punching the police as a default, but in my opinion, protests need to be disruptive if they're going to get anyone's attention at all. I don't really see what a few people standing on the sidewalk with cardboard si…

In the US if you're with a group of people and there is some leader or group planning unlawful property destruction or violence, there is a very very good chance it is a fed or confidential informant operation and you are the mark / patsy to which all the blame will be assigned when you're staring at a sheet of paper that says US v [your name] .

Are you trying to say the US are snitches? Or in any case, more snitches than the Europeans? More snitches than the ex-communists from the Eastern Europe?

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. Farmer SELLS land (for $10) with a deed restriction that it is to be used for a public park. Hand wavey timey wimey... Deed restriction 'magically' goes away. Gets sold for $10M.

So a city should tie its hands permanently because of a gift? Donations can now override city planning? Tired of paying property tax? Gift your house to the city with a deed that says they have to rent it back to you forever for $1 a year? Lets be clear, this wouldnt even be news if it wasnt for "Datacentre"

Yes. Society doesn't work if the government is above contract law. If the city can't abide by it's contracts it should not enter into them. Unlike abusive software TOSs the sale was/is not self executing/binding/changed after the fact. The city chose to enter into it with their eyes open.

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#416
post #371
post #368

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably because we have a well established history of regularly changing regimes. Since we overthrew royalty in 1789 we've had five republics, two empires, three monarchies and a bunch of short-lived totalitarian regimes, coups and other major political events. If anything, the longevity of the Fifth Republic is starting to become unusual (only the Third Republic and the Ancien Régime have lasted longer). Maybe we'r…

How well did they turn out for people each time?

Health insurance, unions, paid vacation... al in all I'd say not that bad.

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#417
The picture at the top of the article seems at odds with the text of the article.

The text says 135,000 square feet for the data center. Given the area marked city owned property says it is 560 feet. 135,000 square feet would be an area 240 feet wide alongside the road.

The area marked in red. is substantially larger than that.

130680 square feet is three acres. I wonder if the number is a rounded conversion from acreage. It seems a bit short of the 87acres that is specified as the amount given to the city.

Maybe the entire red outlined area is 87Acres, It's kinda hard to eyeball an irregular shape like that.

Re: A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center

#419
post #393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The solution here might be the appeals court, since there is a deed restriction. The city agreed to it when they paid $10 for the land. The article mentions that Texas courts tend to be pretty serious about enforcing deed restrictions.

That property was transferred multiple times after the farmer gave it away. I can’t tell if that save deed restriction followed those sales

AFAIU, the people suing have no privity; they're just a neighbor and don't have any right to enforce the covenant. (If the covenant had granted them an interest, they could have.) Presumably the original property owner who granted the land, or their successors in interest, could sue to enforce the covenant, but they haven't.
Post reply on HN