[dead]
Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
41–50 of 101 posts
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#42The Dario Legendarium is definitely going to be a fun piece of work for historians to interrogate as to the origin of this age. The relative personalities of the orgs involved show somewhat in their naming: {o1,4o,3.5,5.5} vs. {Haiku,Sonnet,Opus} vs. {3.1, 3.5-pro, 3.5-flash, 3.5-flash-lite} vs. {3.7, 3.7-plus, 3.7-max} It's a pity that Samsung isn't in the mix. I would have liked to have used a model named Samsung G…
And Sony as well - AI-LLM1000XM5 Mark II.
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#43- Prayer: Press enter and hope for the best.
- Parable: Responds to the question that you didn't know you needed to ask.
- Bible: Dozens of parable instances reporting in different epochs. Tokens are redeemed on expiry.
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#44Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#45I like how the original triplet's initials represent their behavior well: - Opus is OP, like OverPowered - Sonnet is SO, like your significant other (this was more meaningful in Sonnet 3.7 days) - Haiku is HA, like the reaction to a bad joke The latest model, naturally, needed three letters: FAB. I'm now looking forward to ABS and LO
Lo! I show you the Overclaude!
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#46The Dario Legendarium is definitely going to be a fun piece of work for historians to interrogate as to the origin of this age. The relative personalities of the orgs involved show somewhat in their naming: {o1,4o,3.5,5.5} vs. {Haiku,Sonnet,Opus} vs. {3.1, 3.5-pro, 3.5-flash, 3.5-flash-lite} vs. {3.7, 3.7-plus, 3.7-max} It's a pity that Samsung isn't in the mix. I would have liked to have used a model named Samsung G…
Samsung Galaxy Brain S26
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#47This is great. "saga" and "canon" are most definitely a future model name candidates, although for lulz I'd like to see "Cinematic Universe"
Zack Snyder's Saga is also a good one
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#48Anthropic intentionally degrading responses shows you they're also focusing on the wrong things. Rather than producing the best model possible, they're nerfing their models' capabilities.
People believing myths and fables are factual perhaps can expect to be a little bit disappointed.
[deleted]
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#49Anthropic intentionally degrading responses shows you they're also focusing on the wrong things. Rather than producing the best model possible, they're nerfing their models' capabilities.
People believing myths and fables are factual perhaps can expect to be a little bit disappointed.
Was thinking similarly.
"Fable" is not the name I would have chosen for a product that has to argue for the fact of its own economic viability but it is the correct mood. Perhaps Anthropic is trolling Zitron.
Re: Anthropic's model naming, extrapolated
#50I do think Anthropic nailed their naming down much better than OpenAI
I miss the days when the dropdown menu (in their consumer product with a billion users) asked me if I wanted to use o3, 4o, 4o-mini, o4-mini, gpt-4.1, gpt-4.1-mini, or gpt-4.5 (Research Preview).