Live data from Hacker News

Notes on DeepSeek

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 157 posts

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#71
post #66
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

US used AI (Claude on Maven) to determine a girl's elementary school as a target in war[0] and then triple tapped it and you're still more worried about hypothetical misuses of the single country responsible for this technology not being concentrated in the hands of a few powerful elite? ffs [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/11/...

Its horrible event, but it was hit because Iranian regime builds schools and hospitals across the street from military bases. Nothing to do with AI and can happen in any war. Do some research, check sattelite imagery: https://goo.gl/maps/ZoAXkw1iFwyF7exQ8?g_st=ac PS: I not trying defend bombing schools, but posting that its "AI" resposible is opposite of what you need to do if you care. Its military - there been spec…

The U.S. operates over 160 public schools physically located on military installations

https://oldcc.gov/our-programs/public-schools-military-insta...

I never said AI is responsible. I pointed out the US is clearly the one using AI in dystopian ways.

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#72
post #5

From the notes, they seem humble and empathic. We're lucky to have China imposing competiton to the western AI megacorps. If it wasn't for China, I would probably have to spend $100/mo on AI instead of $10 like I do currently while using DeepSeek and MiMo (opencode Go plan). And while I could do so comfortably, I feel for those who can't. It must feel incredibly isolating to only watch others have access to expensive…

Ever since I found Opencode Go AI coding is fun. I always hate the feeling of working inside a fenced constraint where if I just go hard enough I suddenly hit a wall and have to pay up a LOT more.

It's crazy how much you get out from Deepseek V4 Flash alone.

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#73
post #5

From the notes, they seem humble and empathic. We're lucky to have China imposing competiton to the western AI megacorps. If it wasn't for China, I would probably have to spend $100/mo on AI instead of $10 like I do currently while using DeepSeek and MiMo (opencode Go plan). And while I could do so comfortably, I feel for those who can't. It must feel incredibly isolating to only watch others have access to expensive…

[flagged]

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#74
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> China distills and is therefore possibly not that competent. I heard that argument more than one year ago, when chain of thought and reasoning cycles started to be hudden to protect against distillation. Meanwhile, models as DeepSeek and MiMo are nothing short of excellent nowadays. Ever since I switched away from OpenAI to DeepSeek I never felt the need to go back.

Deepseek Flash V4 really was a "holy shit" moment and deserves the praise/hype it's been getting from users. I have a multi-tier subscription strategy I've maintained for the last year of: 1. $20-$30 plan from first Claude now Codex for "SOTA" 2. Gemini via the extra $10/mo or so from my Google One plan 3. a cheap fallback plan. Together it gives me plenty of head room/model performance for $40ish/mo, plus letting me…

Man, I decided to try DS with a healthy dose of skepticism.

I canceled ChatGPT because I would be on vacations. Codex was pretty great, but I thought "Let me put 10 bucks on Deepseek API and plug it into Claude Code".

I was completely blown away. I found it even better than Claude or Codex. And those 10 bucks? It lasted for more than a month.

I don't see myself coming back to Claude/OpenAI.

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#75
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

thanks. this really isnt that long, might as well paste in full here since OP deleted. Notes on DeepSeek: We visited the company HQ last Tuesday. It was founded in 2023 by Liang Wenfeng and operated out of his hedge fund, High-Flyer, until somewhat recently. The company released their R1 model in January 2025, so it was interesting to see what they’ve been doing The company is located in an unmarked, 12-story buildin…

> They were not at all concerned with some kind of hostile / AGI takeover scenario. this doesn't sound belivable, or at least it seems off. competent ai engineers should have good intution about how agents work, and what happens when they don't do what you want them to do: https://www.forbes.com/sites/boazsobrado/2026/03/11/alibabas...

[deleted]

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> kids were pushed to use AI for homework, now it is disallowed and frowned upon. In short mixed messaging. in the early 2000s in california universities you'd get marked down for citing wikipedia. so the good souls told everyone "see the number in brackets[2] after what you're trying to cite the article for? just click that then click the archive.org or whatever link there, then cite that ." Now? i think wiki is con…

I think Wikipedia's still considered unreliable, but the question that should be asked is whether the author even read the source in "the number in brackets" to ensure that it's even backed properly. Just like how people should use AI for research, I guess.

When i comment that i've researched using AI this way, it short circuits the brain of the listener/viewer and suddenly my sources aren't valid.

a bing or google or wiki search to get the primary or secondary sources are okay, but if i use chat.deepseek.com instead, suddenly it isn't okay.

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#79
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The CCP is very active in the matter of AI. In fact, the DeepSeek moment was responsible for Xi calling for a private meeting with tech bosses, including the exiled Alibaba founder Ma. Which is practically unheard of in China politics. I don't have enough information to say whether the Chinese leadership sees AI "just as the next technology" or they are more cautious due to its double-sword nature. But the immense ef…

There's plenty to not like about the CCP, but their strategic investment in the country as a whole is impressive. It would be great to have that on our side as well but with the current state of things that is a non-starter.

We have a lot of propaganda to deprogram regarding it being evil to do that.

Re: Notes on DeepSeek

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because they are subsidized by the Chinese government. This is literally a tactic to destroy global competition. It's a smart move to make everyone dependent on them.

1. this seems to be based on misconceptions about how the chinese economy works 2. why haven't they done it yet? is the implication that they will wait until they're dominant in some x number of industries worldwide and then... raise prices? p.s. how would such "subsidization" work on a such a scale? if you think the EVs, PV panels, etc are cheap because the govt like, just covers the loss on every sale(?) where do t…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN