Live data from Hacker News

Policy on the AI Exponential

darioamodei.com

11–20 of 280 posts

Re: Policy on the AI Exponential

#11
>The government should have the power to block or deter deployment of the model if it is determined, in light of third-party assessment, to present unacceptable risks. This power must be scoped to the above four specific risks and there must be protective measures against political favoritism or arbitrary decisions.

I feel significantly less sympathy for Anthropic's Supply Chain Risk designation if they believe the government should have this power over them. You get what you sign up for.

Re: Policy on the AI Exponential

#12
Can we not open up every article talking to working professionals as if they’re children?

I like to stay up to date on things but more and more I’m finding myself pointing codex at a URL and saying “get to the point”.

Re: Policy on the AI Exponential

#14
I have to be honest, I am tired of reading these arrogant, self-absorbed posts from Dario and Anthropic in general. Opening with this lord of the rings reference just feels like they are trying too hard and are untrustworthy.

As annoying as their tone is, the real big danger is what they are setting up for. All this fear-mongering around Mythos, the overly aggressive controls on Fable, and these manifestos they keep writing, are part of setting up for REGULATORY CAPTURE. Even collaborating with the Pope and the Interfaith Alliance (https://iafsc.org/our-work/faith-ai-covenant) are part of creating a vast support network for regulations and restrictions. Those regulations will help those faith organizations or the government or whatever, but will also help Anthropic’s bottom line.

Those regulations will not support your civil liberties. They will restrict speech, access to AI, and allowed uses of AI. They will lead to bans on use of models from some countries like China, and also bans on open-source or open-weight models.

If Dario wants to be trusted, he needs to explicitly say in writing that Anthropic will not support any legal or regulatory restrictions on open-source AI, open-weight AI, or Chinese models. Otherwise, what he is really saying - even as he claims he is trying to ‘defend democracy’ - is that he and Anthropic do not truly support fundamental rights like our right to speech.

It’s not just Anthropic either. OpenAI had their own recent polemic, pushing for regulations like mandatory safety reviews by agencies for “frontier” models (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387246). It’s a dead giveaway that these companies have no moats, are in serious danger of being a commodity, and are now in the process of using regulations and enshittification to hold onto money and power.

Re: Policy on the AI Exponential

#16

What will be Amodei's job after we have AIs that are better at evrything than humans? Is the AI going to care about our stock exchange playgrounds that reward the future Antropic stock holders?

Well obviously he'll have the AI 'dispose' of the poor and live a life as a king with a select few farmed humans and have the world as a play thing.

Really the entire future of AI at this point seems like "Don't worry about it, we'll figure out when we get there". Works a lot better if you're extremely rich and can afford your own private security.

Re: Policy on the AI Exponential

#18
> AI companies that develop advanced AI models must have strong security standards that protect their model weights

So, basically, make open-weight models illegal. It's nice for Dario to come out and say this so explicitly.

Re: Policy on the AI Exponential

#19
post #16

What will be Amodei's job after we have AIs that are better at evrything than humans? Is the AI going to care about our stock exchange playgrounds that reward the future Antropic stock holders?

Well obviously he'll have the AI 'dispose' of the poor and live a life as a king with a select few farmed humans and have the world as a play thing. Really the entire future of AI at this point seems like "Don't worry about it, we'll figure out when we get there". Works a lot better if you're extremely rich and can afford your own private security.

I never understood why people setting up bunkers expect the security to still be loyal after whatever happens.

Re: Policy on the AI Exponential

#20
I like that he comes up with new laws and regulations for AI companies. Can I suggest some more?

- You shall not embed copyrighted material in your models.

- You shall not bombard every little website in existence with 1 million scraping queries per day.

- You shall not use your political influence to pump and dump your AI (or rocket?) company.

- You shall not imperill the whole IT sector by buying all CPU and memory chips.

These new rules will affect every society directly in a positive way. Thanks.

Post reply on HN