Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
macobserver.com
Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
1–10 of 52 posts
Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#2Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#3Interesting, but the timeline seems to be inaccurate.
Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#4So this is not an "Apple" article at all despite the "Mac" in the name. It's a FreeBSD article.
How did FreeBSD stuff get into Linux though?
Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#5It's also on my Linux. So this is not an "Apple" article at all despite the "Mac" in the name. It's a FreeBSD article. How did FreeBSD stuff get into Linux though?
Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#6Interesting, but the timeline seems to be inaccurate.
It's a list of calendar dates, not an actual timeline.
I wonder whether the developers _could_ have put them in chronological order, ex. 12/13/3019 appearing before 03/18/3021; or if the format requires the ordering it has now.
Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#7The data itself (LOTR dates) first appeared in 4.4BSD (though it was part of the file `calendar.history` [ http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/2.0.5/usr.bin/calendar... ]), and has since passed to FreeBSD (where the LOTR dates were split off into a separate file [ http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=11... ]) and subsequently Mac OS X.
Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#8Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#9Where do I file a bug report? The date of "Frodo & Bilbo's birthday" was actually given in the book as September 22nd. In my file it's 09/14.
Re: Need The Lord Of The Rings Timeline? It's On Your Mac
#10It's also on my Linux. So this is not an "Apple" article at all despite the "Mac" in the name. It's a FreeBSD article. How did FreeBSD stuff get into Linux though?
The article is hosted on macobserver.com, which explains why it has 'Mac' in the title. Also, looking at the article itself it is clearly intended for casual/non-geek computer users. Seeing that OS X + Windows probably cover ~99% of this group, and the calender is not on windows (I suppose), it's not that strange that the article refers to Macs either.