The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
11–20 of 87 posts
Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#12Copyright stifles creative output. I believe that if we got rid of copyright (not just for textbooks), the quality and quantity of published work will increase.
Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#13Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#14Copyright stifles creative output. I believe that if we got rid of copyright (not just for textbooks), the quality and quantity of published work will increase.
I do agree the term is too long, I would support something in the range of 5-20 years.
Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#15Free, high quality learning materials like this are an absolute treasure, and without them, I wouldn't be where I am in my career today.
Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#16Buying used global editions from the international students is the move for undergrads at big schools. Hardcover binding and color print were not missed and definitely not worth 10-20x more. Even published lecturers would ask students to fetch a "course pack" compilation of sloppy photocopied excerpts for purchase by on-campus print operations. Somehow this wasn't piracy. It is no secret that publishers and bookselle…
Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#17Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#18This was always so odd to me. I used to think it was just a US weird thing but I understand it happens in many more countries as well (and maybe in my own country as well; I did go through my first degree literally two decades ago, and only at one university). When I went through my first degree, the lecturer provided the material - lectures and some handouts. Every so often there would be a reference to some book for some particular additional topic, but it was never required.
Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#19Re: The Case for Free Online Books (2014)
#20Copyright stifles creative output. I believe that if we got rid of copyright (not just for textbooks), the quality and quantity of published work will increase.
Why would people author published works if they won’t get compensated? Countries with weak copyright enforcement don’t tend to have better output than the US (I think most would argue it’s worse). I do agree the term is too long, I would support something in the range of 5-20 years.
I’m not saying we are entitled to those efforts but clearly people are willing to do it.