A custom-built AI would be pretty good at replacing a CEO. Think of all the things a company could do if they reduced overhead by that much?
While I agree that AIs would do a good job… Would you rather take instructions from a ruthless robot or ruthless flesh sack?
CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
31–40 of 337 posts
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#32A custom-built AI would be pretty good at replacing a CEO. Think of all the things a company could do if they reduced overhead by that much?
While I agree that AIs would do a good job… Would you rather take instructions from a ruthless robot or ruthless flesh sack?
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
CEOs do get there with lots of politics in almost all cases. It’s all about who’s ass you kiss and who’s ass you don’t and if you’re lucky with timing things might just fall into place. I think it’s exceedingly rare that a CEO is actually competent at their job. In most cases it’s the labor class propping the company up, and in some cases the workers are doing so against the wishes of the CEO. Not that executives wan…
You’re making the case for worker-owned cooperatives. Love it — we need more of them!
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
CEOs do get there with lots of politics in almost all cases. It’s all about who’s ass you kiss and who’s ass you don’t and if you’re lucky with timing things might just fall into place. I think it’s exceedingly rare that a CEO is actually competent at their job. In most cases it’s the labor class propping the company up, and in some cases the workers are doing so against the wishes of the CEO. Not that executives wan…
You’re making the case for worker-owned cooperatives. Love it — we need more of them!
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
CEOs do get there with lots of politics in almost all cases. It’s all about who’s ass you kiss and who’s ass you don’t and if you’re lucky with timing things might just fall into place. I think it’s exceedingly rare that a CEO is actually competent at their job. In most cases it’s the labor class propping the company up, and in some cases the workers are doing so against the wishes of the CEO. Not that executives wan…
You’re making the case for worker-owned cooperatives. Love it — we need more of them!
However, I think there's a reason why coops seem to succeed at smaller scales, but there are essentially no large innovative coops.
There are a few large boring coops, and some small innovative ones, but seemingly something is making the CEO/investor board model the one large innovative companies are all using.
I suspect that it's both (1) access to capital is far harder for coops, and (2) that workplace democracy and hardcore mission focus aren't fully compatible. That is, "you cannot serve two masters" without losing focus on one of them.
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't need custom built anything, ChatGPT could generate corporate initiatives and PR statements all day and no one would notice.
100% been saying this for a while now. the main thing AI will be able to replace is a C suite.
a bad king and a bad CEO could be replaced with a spinning top with no loss in productivity (and maybe some gain).
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#37It’s hilarious to me that when you stop investing in juniors and seniors who use your AIs retire, what are they going to do then?
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re making the case for worker-owned cooperatives. Love it — we need more of them!
Don’t you still need someone to make high level decisions?
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#39I have spent almost my entire adult life (since 1986) shipping products. One of the very first things that I learned, was that "shipping" > "designing".
There's so much work in delivering products that will carry your brand, and then must be supported.
I liken it to having children. Conceiving them is fun. Delivering them is painful. Raising them, is a lifetime of work.
In my experience, the same type of thing applies to products that we ship (and charge money for).
Re: CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs
#40A custom-built AI would be pretty good at replacing a CEO. Think of all the things a company could do if they reduced overhead by that much?
Who takes responsibility when the AI does something unethical or illegal? Do we put the computer in jail? Or do we just look the other way like we do with human CEOs?