331–340 of 1001 posts
I cancelled my Claude Max plan the other day. I find Claude Code incredibly slow these days compared to Codex and Cursor. I find speed matters more and more to me. Fable 5 looks compelling. Fable, I like the word too. Anthropic definitely knows marketing.
For those of us on subscription plans: * From today through June 22, Fable 5 is included on Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans at no extra cost. * On June 23, we’ll remove Fable 5 from those plans. Using it after that will require usage credits. If capacity allows, we’ll extend the included window. * After this point—when sufficient capacity allows us to do so—we aim to restore Fable 5 as a standard part…
Wen UBI
The fable part appears to be that it's affordable by mere mortals. Anthropic support told me "too bad" when I requested a refund.
> Fable 5 is now consuming usage credits instead of your plan limits. Literally have not used Claude Code at all today. I asked it to review the uncommitted code and in Double the cost my ass, I use Opus heavily and it's never like this. I haven't hit a limit on the $100 more than once and that was under heavy load.
On GitHub Copilot for Business, Claude Fable 5 is only available if you are willing to let Anthropic retain your data. That in conjunction with the model being removed from plans in a couple of weeks leads me to believe that Anthropic is between training runs and using this as an opportunity to grab way more training data...
How in blazes do you end up with a 50M line Ruby codebase? WTF?
For those of us on subscription plans: * From today through June 22, Fable 5 is included on Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans at no extra cost. * On June 23, we’ll remove Fable 5 from those plans. Using it after that will require usage credits. If capacity allows, we’ll extend the included window. * After this point—when sufficient capacity allows us to do so—we aim to restore Fable 5 as a standard part…
If you rely on this as a core part of your business/profession, you will be at their mercy and subject to whatever whims or challenges they have.
On this thread and similar, I'm noticing that some strong opinions about $LLM_PROVIDER are coming from accounts without much post history. With so much on the line, and the way that HN can influence developer behavior, I wonder what ways we can responsibly consume opinions in a thread like this. Not to cast too much criticism. HN is extremely well-moderated (thanks team!). But think we-developers need to be very wary…