FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
21–30 of 417 posts
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#22This is how it works in Australia, which means it's a pain for tourists as you need to provide a passport for ID and get it activated, as opposed to just grabbing one at an airport kiosk and being ready to go on your way to the taxi or train like most other places.
> like most other places Much of EU requires ID for some time now. France is a bit strange, requires registration after 23 days or something. Germany, Italy, Spain it's basically impossible. The US is rather unique in that it does not require registration.
EU countries have had these requirements for years and years and never moved to actually enforce them.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#23This is how it works in Australia, which means it's a pain for tourists as you need to provide a passport for ID and get it activated, as opposed to just grabbing one at an airport kiosk and being ready to go on your way to the taxi or train like most other places.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
> like most other places Much of EU requires ID for some time now. France is a bit strange, requires registration after 23 days or something. Germany, Italy, Spain it's basically impossible. The US is rather unique in that it does not require registration.
Huh? At least in Germany, Spain and France all of the smaller shops fill in fake info without even asking. EU countries have had these requirements for years and years and never moved to actually enforce them.
Last I traveled the shop required a passport or uploading one to get an eSIM ahead of time.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh? At least in Germany, Spain and France all of the smaller shops fill in fake info without even asking. EU countries have had these requirements for years and years and never moved to actually enforce them.
I wasn't taking blatant fraud into account. I'm sure that's possible everywhere. I'd bet you can buy cigarettes without the tax stamps in the same shop too. Last I traveled the shop required a passport or uploading one to get an eSIM ahead of time.
> Last I traveled the shop required a passport or uploading one to get an eSIM ahead of time.
Sounds like you went to a carrier boutique and not one of the million independent shops.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#26Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#27Fundamentally un-American. That being said, many countries across the world already do this to eliminate burner phones. And many messaging apps require a phone number anyways so this basically locks down anonymous messaging through a phone.
It's much more concerning when said practices are undertaken by the U.S.
Just because other countries do something isn't a justification to bring the practice into the U.S. despite that being a justification used with increasing prevalence these days.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#28They’ll get around to guns eventually …
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#29This is how it works in Australia, which means it's a pain for tourists as you need to provide a passport for ID and get it activated, as opposed to just grabbing one at an airport kiosk and being ready to go on your way to the taxi or train like most other places.
I mean. It’s the same, you just have to show your passport and fill a form. It takes 1minute to get it done, you can do it on your way to the taxi if you want. Though e-sim are more practical now
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
What problem were they hoping to solve with that legislation?
The problem of citizens having anonymous internet connectivity.
Not that we didn’t get anything in return but the idea that the worlds foremost military industrial complex just gave this to the world because they loved us is laughable.