Earlier quoted context omitted.
And that includes London, it lists "excluding London" as £65k. People overestimate how much senior devs in the UK earn, even after knowing they're not well paid, my usual response to hearing we should be earning £90k+ is, "well give us a job then"!
A friend is making about £180k / yr in London, and they bought a house recently in London. I think that's a lot, and his wife also makes a similar amount, slightly more. That seems to be the minimum, otherwise you're a renter for life. Pretty nuts.
Job: Head of Stonehenge
141–150 of 243 posts
Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#142Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#143"If I get the role, what will my budget for repairs be?"
Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#144I was riding in the passenger seat.
There was a male and female police officer standing at the side of the road, beside a "Road Closed" sign blocking the entrance.
The male police officer came to my window and started yelling in my face:
"We are closed!! Come back another day!!!"
I knew it would be pointless to argue with this a-hole and there was no other day in my schedule that we could come back. So we left and never got to see it.
Do these old rocks get tired at three in the afternoon or what?
I'll be sending this Head of Stonehenge an email about the experiance...
Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
Raw economy size can be misleading in two ways. The value of a dollar is much less or much more depending on where you're at. So an economy of 10 shekels might mean an economy of 100 widgets, or it might mean an economy of 1 widget. Purchasing power parity (PPP) attempts to account for that. The second is that economies are largely a product of population. An economy of a million making a million shekels is quite a b…
I think GDP per capita can also be misleading though - the GDP per capita of Luxembourg or Brunei is high, but they're such small countries that it's kind of irrelevant. Setting aside the special cases (tiny, oil money, weird finance sectors, tax havens etc) there's basically a handful of countries which are clearly doing something right - the US, Taiwan, the north-eastern European countries (Germany, Austria, Nether…
Something to keep in mind is that in the 70s digital tech also started to come into its own and that basically provided a massive economic boon to countries worldwide, but especially in the US. And so the concept of endless infinite exponential growth, as the current experiment effectively requires, was coincidentally paired alongside an era that made that briefly seem possible.
But now that that era is fading, the consequences of our actions are catching up to us. For instance in the US interest on the debt is now about 3% of the GDP, and the debt itself about 120% of GDP. And as faith in the debt falters, that will increase exponentially because rates for borrowing (which is how the government 'prints' money) will increase, due to reduced demand paired with increases in supply for such.
--
Basically instead of looking at GDP or whatever, I'd look to things on life contentment, optimism, and so on. If those are positive, then I think a government must be doing something right. If those are negative, then who cares what this metric or that says?
Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#146In the fall of 2023 I tried to visit Stonehenge. We arrived at 15:15 local time. I was riding in the passenger seat. There was a male and female police officer standing at the side of the road, beside a "Road Closed" sign blocking the entrance. The male police officer came to my window and started yelling in my face: "We are closed!! Come back another day!!!" I knew it would be pointless to argue with this a-hole and…
Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#147Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#148Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#149Re: Job: Head of Stonehenge
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's not be delusional. The UK is not a poor country, and 64K is low by US tech standards but it's good by any other measure.
The UK is poor and sprinting as fast as it can towards being poorer.