Live data from Hacker News

Let's Encrypt bans certificate usage in any US sanctioned territory [pdf]

letsencrypt.org

31–40 of 404 posts

Re: Let's Encrypt bans certificate usage in any US sanctioned territory [pdf]

#33
post #25
post #3

Makes sense, they are US company. I am surprised it took them that long.

"US company must obey US law" doesn't make for a very interesting headline.

The headline is more « US law is batshit and extends well beyond its borders with real world consequences »

Re: Let's Encrypt bans certificate usage in any US sanctioned territory [pdf]

#34
the reach is by rough estimates ~2.5–6 million websites globally, 2–5 million of those in Russia and 0.3-1 million in Iran

Whatever USofA, it's not hard to have their own cosmodrome and certificates.

Tangential, in 2026 website certificates feel like nothing, disposable automation artifact, toxic max-security[1], vehicle for those who rent seek, fingerprint.

[1] https://tom7.org/httpv/httpv.pdf

Re: Let's Encrypt bans certificate usage in any US sanctioned territory [pdf]

#35
This somehow confirms my gut feeling that digital certificates are mainly a means to enforce exclusion on behalf of the certificate authority ownership. It is a tool to prevent people from taking full ownership and control of whatever is affected by digital certificates, be it software, firmware, hardware, or as in this case SSL/TLS. That's digital tyranny in disguise.

Re: Let's Encrypt bans certificate usage in any US sanctioned territory [pdf]

#37

This somehow confirms my gut feeling that digital certificates are mainly a means to enforce exclusion on behalf of the certificate authority ownership. It is a tool to prevent people from taking full ownership and control of whatever is affected by digital certificates, be it software, firmware, hardware, or as in this case SSL/TLS. That's digital tyranny in disguise.

I always saw it as a trust-chain and think that anyone is welcomed to create a root certificate and distribute it to whomever trusts them. Most simple services may not need TLS, but with the ISPs eavesdropping on our communication, a form of secure communication is required and the currently best solution we have requires a trust-chain to be built.

Re: Let's Encrypt bans certificate usage in any US sanctioned territory [pdf]

#40
post #21

How are they going to enforce this?

I would imagine, as a CA that issues only DV certs, they'd disallow issuance to various ccTLDs, and perhaps stop newAccount registrations with email addresses at those ccTLDs. That's about as much as they could do - IP-blocking by region is ineffective and crude at best.
Post reply on HN