Earlier quoted context omitted.
From what I can tell with a quick reading, it is not. The opinion states that the fee is a tax and not a penalty and based on that ruling then further rules that the tax oversteps Congress’s delegated authority. The whole penalty thing seems weird because obviously it’s not a penalty, so I don’t know if the president’s lawyers argued a dumb point and lost or if I’m missing some legal nuance here. Regardless, the opin…
Page 18 and ff. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.293... > I don’t know if the president’s lawyers argued a dumb point and lost They argued several dumb points, you’ll have to narrow it down.
> They argued several dumb points, you’ll have to narrow it down.
Arguing that the fee is a “penalty” in this case seems pointlessly dumb.
Seems like they should have argued the fee a “fee”.