Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

news.ycombinator.com

81–90 of 250 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Go see Weird Al. It was a really great show. My wife only knew one of his songs (Word Crimes, she's a professional editor), and she loved the show. I loved it too.

I just saw him a couple weeks ago. It's such a fun show, people there are from ALL walks. He's no spring chicken but he gives it his all, and his band and backups do too. Just an all-around great dude.

Will confirm, all-around great dude. He's the kind of guy you WOULD find in those independent venues. He'll happily go out of his way for it.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

#82

Why hasn't there been a real competitor to youtube yet? Similar question. Some markets really are screwed.

TikTok and Instagram have YouTube worried for sure.

Maybe because of a paradigm shift to short videos, but neither can replace Youtube's actual long-form video service.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

#83

From the point of view of the promoters, concerts are a two-sided marketplace. Two-sided marketplaces are notoriously difficult for small players to compete in. You need to attract good acts so people will buy tickets, but to attract the top acts you need to show that you can sell lots of tickets. Ticketmaster avoided the two-sided market problem until they reached scale. They were just a website where you buy ticket…

[flagged]

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

#84

From the point of view of the promoters, concerts are a two-sided marketplace. Two-sided marketplaces are notoriously difficult for small players to compete in. You need to attract good acts so people will buy tickets, but to attract the top acts you need to show that you can sell lots of tickets. Ticketmaster avoided the two-sided market problem until they reached scale. They were just a website where you buy ticket…

[flagged]

Because he wants to

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FWIW I actually prefer we simply tell private businesses that it's their responsibility to provide the environment/setting their employees work in. By that I mean if ticket master wants a monopoly they should have to build the stadiums too. No taxpayer money, incentives, land, or other interest group perks given.

I'm ok with either. Though I tend to think public ownership makes more sense because a city can only support so many venues in general.

Most cities have lots of venues of various sizes, I like a market place of them rather than a publicly owned monopoly. (Hence why I dont like Canada healthcare either)

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

#87

From the point of view of the promoters, concerts are a two-sided marketplace. Two-sided marketplaces are notoriously difficult for small players to compete in. You need to attract good acts so people will buy tickets, but to attract the top acts you need to show that you can sell lots of tickets. Ticketmaster avoided the two-sided market problem until they reached scale. They were just a website where you buy ticket…

[flagged]

I didn't?

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't there been a real competitor to Ticketmaster yet?

#88

From the point of view of the promoters, concerts are a two-sided marketplace. Two-sided marketplaces are notoriously difficult for small players to compete in. You need to attract good acts so people will buy tickets, but to attract the top acts you need to show that you can sell lots of tickets. Ticketmaster avoided the two-sided market problem until they reached scale. They were just a website where you buy ticket…

There were local ticket operations across the US, ticketmaster just bought them all up
Post reply on HN