Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hardly an argument to import teachers on work visas.
so you want to leave rural children without teachers?
Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
81–90 of 375 posts
Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#82Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are an excess of teachers in the USA already. It’s a big reason they aren’t paid that well. No good reason to import them except to pay them even less .
But evidently they don’t want to move to rural America.
The solution for this is simple - pay them more. There are plenty of recently graduated teachers who would work in Alaska for a few years if it paid off their student loans or let them save up a down payment on a house.
Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#84Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
But evidently they don’t want to move to rural America.
Hardly an argument to import teachers on work visas.
You’ll say “pay them more”. But who are you taxing more? Because no one is happy when the gov starts looking at being more efficient and starts laying off some admin people either.
Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#86There must be a better way to prevent the consulting firms from abusing this program
Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
But evidently they don’t want to move to rural America.
Hardly an argument to import teachers on work visas.
If teachers were underpaid - it would be a poor argument.
But if there's an acute shortage of 'key' workers in jobs that require education, for jobs where wages are materially above market pricing - then this is where you want H1B type programs.
The idea is that it should not harm the local market for labour, and it's usually not reasonable to expect market wages to be a radical departure from where they would be otherwise.
Aka - if teachers are earning $80K on average, then it's not going to work out i some small towns need to pay $150K to bring people in from the city, it also creates problems for locals.
Special worker programs can be well utilized here in the right circumstances.
The 'bad' scenario is when labour market is flooded where those jobs would otherwise go to locals.
Tata/Infosys (generic IT workers) are alone probably 80% of the problem.
Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#88Why can’t Americans do these jobs?
They can, which is why many companies do the bare minimum malicious compliance to claim thet they attempted to hire Americans for these jobs. Things like ads in the local newspaper that 99% of qualified Americans will never see: https://www.newsweek.com/h1b-job-ads-green-cards-targeted-im...
Second, the local newspaper requirement is created by the Dept of Labor itself, specifically to protect local workers in the area where Labor Market Test is being done!!!
It is not malicious compliance by firms, it is goodwill compliance by firms, to whatever DOL requires them to do. Dont like it? ask your DOL why.
Third, paper ads create audit trail that DOL wants, they dont recognize e-boards like linkedin/indeed as their audit trail is considered "soft"
Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
But evidently they don’t want to move to rural America.
Rural Alaska... Just about the most inhospitable climate in the US, remote, and with a very high cost of living. Teachers can find work just about anywhere, they have little incentive to stay in Alaska. The solution for this is simple - pay them more. There are plenty of recently graduated teachers who would work in Alaska for a few years if it paid off their student loans or let them save up a down payment on a hous…
Re: Federal judge blocks H1B visa $100K fee
#90I thought locking down H1Bs actually had bipartisan support? How can you argue there aren't enough jobs, and support H1Bs to fill jobs? I can see Alaska's case since encouraging people to move there very well may be a requirement, but surely there's somewhere between $0 and $100k that would convince someone to move there.
You’re putting words in people’s mouths. The fact that people oppose this solution doesn’t mean they disagree with the problem. We oppose it because it’s stupid; it’s the first solution that a dim-witted eight-year-old would’ve come up with. The program needs to be reformed so it only applies to people with skills that genuinely cannot be found domestically. Given the difference in expected engineering salaries for m…