Live data from Hacker News

APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

blog.alexmaccaw.com

31–40 of 108 posts

Re: APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

#33
post #17

None of this will work in IE7, IE8, IE9 or IE10. This will transform absolutely nothing on the web for many years to come. I can understand people getting hyped up about cool new tech like this, but the article has way too much hyperbole to take any of it seriously.

So what?! How much time it takes to install a different/newer browser? I tell you - less than a minute. There.

Re: APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

#34
post #17

None of this will work in IE7, IE8, IE9 or IE10. This will transform absolutely nothing on the web for many years to come. I can understand people getting hyped up about cool new tech like this, but the article has way too much hyperbole to take any of it seriously.

the article has way too much hyperbole to take any of it seriously.

This statement is itself hyperbolic.

A lot of these advances are going to impact web applications. Sure if you're building a brochure site then you should probably stick to web technology circa 2000.

The article mentions 350MM chrome users, FF has about the same market share. That makes close of 3/4 of a billion web users who will automatically receive the updates that allow app developers to target these new features. That's a lot of potential customers.

Oh and for those who can't or don't know how to upgrade away from IE7-10 there's ChromeFrame. That covers the remaining portion of the web.

In other words... no, the article is not hyperbolic and feel free to take all of it seriously.

Re: APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

#35
post #17

None of this will work in IE7, IE8, IE9 or IE10. This will transform absolutely nothing on the web for many years to come. I can understand people getting hyped up about cool new tech like this, but the article has way too much hyperbole to take any of it seriously.

IE should eventually support a lot of this also? IE10 has made some pretty big jumps. I guess they still haven't worked out having everyone on one version and automatically updating though.

Re: APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

#36
post #35
post #17

None of this will work in IE7, IE8, IE9 or IE10. This will transform absolutely nothing on the web for many years to come. I can understand people getting hyped up about cool new tech like this, but the article has way too much hyperbole to take any of it seriously.

IE should eventually support a lot of this also? IE10 has made some pretty big jumps. I guess they still haven't worked out having everyone on one version and automatically updating though.

Quick, anyone know when Windows 9 comes out?

Re: APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

#37

    CSS filters are already in Chrome and Safari, and allow advanced styling as as blurring, warping and modifying the color intensities of elements. 
Isn't it funny that the first browser to implement these "filters" was IE 4.0 [1]. And at that time using any of these filters was a bit frowned upon and amateurish. Now suddenly everyone is gung-ho about it and calling it the API that will transform the web in 2013.

[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms532849(v=vs.85).as...

Re: APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

#38

ES6 may well be the death of Javascript. They've managed to turn Javascript into Java, which means web programming is about to turn into a buggy nightmare.

Even if what you're saying is true (which it isn't), it's completely optional. Don't want to use `let` scoping? Use `var` instead! etc.

Re: APIs that will transform the Web in 2013

#40

Hard to see how ECMAScript 6 will transform the internet when everyone writing Javascript for the public web still has to support IE8.

Write the code in ES6 and compile it to ES5, then use Modernizer or some equivalent to detect which runtime is supported by the client's browser and serve the appropriate script.

Or just ignore IE8 and assume the "revenue loss" from anyone running that browser not being able to navigate your site is worth the loss of headache.

I always wonder why it is an assumption IE support is mandatory. As others in this thread have pointed out, Chrome / FF now have a combined 700 million and I'd assume between 50 - 70% of the browser marketshare. At some point, using backwards broken nonsense to support outdated browsers becomes a financially unfriendly situation, especially when you can't reproduce a lot of the newer goodness (like html5 localstorage or websockets) in older versions of IE.

Post reply on HN