MiMo-v2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1T model with 1000 tokens per second

Post by trollbridge » Mon, Jun 08, 2026, 4:50 PM UTC

ignoramous wrote: post #62

varispeed wrote: post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see bigger problem with model inconsistency. You never know whether Anthropic will route your request to a cheaper model for the price of Opus. So you can never estimate how much a task will cost, because you might have to restart several times and pay for each attempt. Then you have to prompt models to gauge whether they are real or impostors which also adds to token usage.

> You never know whether Anthropic will route your request to a cheaper model for the price of Opus For non subsidized plans? Pretty sure they'd need to put this in ToS, or law suites would have followed by now.

Post by lokar » Mon, Jun 08, 2026, 4:53 PM UTC

kypro wrote: post #76

amunozo wrote: post #17

These price and speed optimization from Chinese providers, combined with the raising prices from American ones will change the game sooner than later. Many companies are finding issues with the AI bills already.

Another problem is that US models are all closed source, and if you're a large corporate you may not want your org to be held hostage by OpenAI / Anthropic. I genuinely don't understand what moat these US model labs have. If they're saying recursive self improvement is just around the corner and Chinese labs are only slightly behind the leading US models, what moat does the US labs have? Are the US models going to re…

Post by ncr100 » Mon, Jun 08, 2026, 4:54 PM UTC

trollbridge wrote: post #106

ignoramous wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Chinese "Neijuan" is real & well reported: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/what-i... It is another thing the BigLabs accuse open weight models of benefiting from distillation & other techniques & essentially avoid higher training costs (which typically bleed into bills end users pay for inference). Ex A: https://www.anthropic.com/research/2028-ai-leadership Ex B: https://www.reuters.com/worl…

We buy cheap Chinese goods all the time. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. In this case, at least it’s threatening multimillion dollar salary jobs instead of entire towns of working class people in America or Mexico. And the Chinese labs actually release their weights. You could call it… open AI.

Post by trollbridge » Mon, Jun 08, 2026, 4:54 PM UTC

Oras wrote: post #45

1k TPS is great, but I’m more fascinated by the amount of AI generated comments in this thread!

Post by [deleted] » Mon, Jun 08, 2026, 4:54 PM UTC

flexagoon wrote: post #92

goyozi wrote: post #58

Fast AI seems genuinely exciting and somewhat unsettling to me. Right now Claude is faster than me on some tasks but we’re at least close. I have a prompt to clean up a PR that’s been running for 1h now and I expect it to take another few. It’s hard to imagine how the workflow would look like if it was near-instant. On the one hand, it might be easier to focus. Some prompts take so long that I start to multitask and…

I'm using Deepseek-v4-pro as my main model and this is sometimes pretty annoying, I have to do some easy boring task, think "I'll just leave the agent to do it and go take a nap", but it's already done writing the code before I even walk away from the computer