This was hard to read; the writer really did not come from the school of succinctness. If the writer is reading this, please try making an edit where you remove as much of the fluff and rephrase sentences like: > When I read this detail, tucked away near the end of a Guardian article, I winced to see another of my predictions come true; that the ‘Butlerian Jihad’ would soon enter public life not as mere literary meta…
The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
21–30 of 76 posts
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#22Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#23Belgian action group "Code Rood" (Code Red) is planning to occupy a data centre next week... https://code-rouge.be/
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#24Right.
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#25Belgian action group "Code Rood" (Code Red) is planning to occupy a data centre next week... https://code-rouge.be/
Good luck. It's hard enough to get into a data centre when you're authorised to be there.
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#26This was hard to read; the writer really did not come from the school of succinctness. If the writer is reading this, please try making an edit where you remove as much of the fluff and rephrase sentences like: > When I read this detail, tucked away near the end of a Guardian article, I winced to see another of my predictions come true; that the ‘Butlerian Jihad’ would soon enter public life not as mere literary meta…
Why would you argue yours is better?
* One idea per sentence, more than one tends to make massive run-on sentences that go too far.
* Removes irrelevant details. Why does it matter that a Guardian article was the thing that gave the writer the missing link?
Essentially the trick is to take your ideas down to the bare minimum required to express them portably and then write that. It makes things much easier to write (you don't have ans many words to put in the document) and the end result is much easier to read (there's less irrelevant details to scan through).
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#27This was hard to read; the writer really did not come from the school of succinctness. If the writer is reading this, please try making an edit where you remove as much of the fluff and rephrase sentences like: > When I read this detail, tucked away near the end of a Guardian article, I winced to see another of my predictions come true; that the ‘Butlerian Jihad’ would soon enter public life not as mere literary meta…
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Butlerian jihad" comes from a science fiction novel from 1965 (Dune, by Frank Herbert). They didn't know about current political correctness 60 years ago.
I know that. Just pointing out your double standards compared to the holocaust.
(My opinion is that neither should be used, but a majority of Americans disagree with me).
To be pedantic, crusade means "holy war" and jihad means "to struggle", so jihad should be more acceptable than crusade, but in English, jihad essentially only has the holy war meaning.
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#29Belgian action group "Code Rood" (Code Red) is planning to occupy a data centre next week... https://code-rouge.be/
Rebellion by the incompetent will not lead anywhere
Re: The Butlerian Jihad Has Begun
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Butlerian jihad" comes from a science fiction novel from 1965 (Dune, by Frank Herbert). They didn't know about current political correctness 60 years ago.
I know that. Just pointing out your double standards compared to the holocaust.