A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#2Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#3Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#4Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#5Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#6Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#7Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#8Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#943% less friction means 43% of fuel saved. Am I reading that right because it will change the world if true.
- The 43% is peak drag reduction in the transition zone only, the bit between laminar and turbulent flow, not across all flight conditions.
- Aerodynamic drag is one part of fuel burn, not a 1:1 proxy. There's also engine efficiency, etc.
- This is skin friction drag on a wind tunnel model, not a full aircraft which has extra bits like windscreen wipers.
I still think it's exciting but I reckon fuel savings would amount to a few percent (aeronautical engineers, please correct me if I'm wrong).
Re: A Fundamental Principle of Aeronautical Engineering Has Been Overturned
#10Are we just expected to understand Japanese ? There's no English version
Your browser can probably provide a reasonable translation on demand from a nearby service. FF on Linux does, so surely whatever you are rocking can manage it too.
There are lots more options.