Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

github.com

251–260 of 331 posts

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#251

You got to love the irony of seeing hundred of users not being able to actually build a desktop version themselves using the cli agent. Are LLMs rendering people that useless?

Note “official” in the request… there are unofficial ones.

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#252

You got to love the irony of seeing hundred of users not being able to actually build a desktop version themselves using the cli agent. Are LLMs rendering people that useless?

Hard for one person to keep up with a product that ships updates multiple times a day.

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#253
post #60

Hey! I manage the unofficial build at https://github.com/aaddrick/claude-desktop-debian Debian is in the name, but scope has grown to all backends, compositors, etc. The main reason must companies don't publish Linux electron apps is fragmentation. If you're doing anything more than rendering a webpage as an app, it starts to get complicated. I've got a bank of VM's setup for testing, and I still need it up.

> The main reason must companies don't publish Linux electron apps But they do? Companies don’t publish anything BUT electron apps. If desktop Linux gets anything from outside of FOSS, it’s electron. See Spotify, discord, slack, vscode… list goes on. I don’t think a for profit company has provided a GTK or qt app for Linux in the last 20 years. I applaud your efforts but this is a supposed trillion dollar company wit…

> I don’t think a for profit company has provided a GTK or qt app for Linux in the last 20 years.

DaVinci resolve is QT. But making a video editor performant in Electron is even harder than writing it in C++..

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#254
post #55

Hey! I manage the unofficial build at https://github.com/aaddrick/claude-desktop-debian Debian is in the name, but scope has grown to all backends, compositors, etc. The main reason must companies don't publish Linux electron apps is fragmentation. If you're doing anything more than rendering a webpage as an app, it starts to get complicated. I've got a bank of VM's setup for testing, and I still need it up.

I have been running Claude Desktop on Linux via the unofficial Debian build for months and it is solid. The unofficial repo at github.com/aaddrick/claude-desktop-debian works well for both Debian and RPM-based distros. That said, an official build would make a huge difference for enterprise adoption. Many companies have policies against unofficial packages, and the signing + update mechanism is always going to be mor…

Can you please not post AI-generated or AI-edited comments to HN? It's not allowed here - see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079.

Of course, it's impossible to know for sure what was LLM processed or not, but most of your posts are getting classified that way.

You obviously have good points to make and are welcome here! but if you'd please write text by hand which you plan to post to HN itself, we'd appreciate it. The community feels strongly about this right now.

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#255
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything that isn’t very simple? Like a llm chat interface? If zoom and Microsoft Teams of all people can do it, anthropic should be able to. Have you considered that maybe their code is just bad?

Microsoft gave up on teams for linux, the app that's available now is a community electron webapp wrapper, and Zoom isn't electron at all, its QT but they chose the path of only supporting a few distros (Ubuntu, Debian, Mint, RedHat) and they also don't rely on system QT versions, they vendor it. If your app is open source, I say just build & test on one of the major distros and let the community port it to others. I…

Using a largely-stock Ubuntu desktop for work the past 6 years, Zoom has also been one of the most broken mainstream apps I've every used on any system ever. I appreciate they provide a native Linux option, but it has consistently been barely functional—often fully unusable to where I'd join important calls from the browser instead.

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can confirm, I hate flatpak

Why?

Not the person who wrote that but i also avoid anything related to Flatpak. The reason is that it adds a lot of extra friction to anything it touches (despite what its proponents may claim), apps ignore various settings, it wastes disk space with pointless duplication and a bunch of other issues i do not remember right now (it isn't like i write those down - i just sometimes decide to try it for something exactly because i forgot all the issues i faced and somehow someone convinced me things aren't as i remember, then recoil in horror afterwards as it turns out things are as i vaguely remember -- of course the main thing i always remember is the distaste i have for the thing, not the individual microdetails that led to the distaste).

Ultimately if something isn't in my distro's repository, i try to compile it from source and if that isn't available, i just use something else.

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#260
post #174

I'm still surprised at how many developers still turn their noses up at using Linux. Like... You already use Docker and deploy to K8S... On Linux...

I don’t really care about the OS. I want a beefy laptop with a good keyboard and trackpad, long battery life, and a crisp screen. Preferably very silent, bonus points for a clean design. That’s the value proposition of a MacBook.

I also care about my desktop supporting consumer electronics without having to waste an afternoon debugging Bluetooth drivers every two weeks
Post reply on HN