Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

github.com

181–190 of 331 posts

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#181
post #56
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Biggest problem with Linux apps - i.e. distributed with ease the way that Windows and macOS apps are distributed, is the lack of a stable ABI. If you asked me about this 20 years ago I'd say in 2026 there'd for sure be a stable ABI, but no.

The stable Linux ABI is Win32 provided by Wine.

[dead]

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#182

Hey! I manage the unofficial build at https://github.com/aaddrick/claude-desktop-debian Debian is in the name, but scope has grown to all backends, compositors, etc. The main reason must companies don't publish Linux electron apps is fragmentation. If you're doing anything more than rendering a webpage as an app, it starts to get complicated. I've got a bank of VM's setup for testing, and I still need it up.

I know they don't do it due to fragmentation, but things like appimage do exist.

Genuine question: how does that help?

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#184
Which Linux.

You build it for Ubuntu , people will demand fedora. Build fedora they’ll want Arch.

This is fine for FOSS projects where the community can fork and contribute, but as a company I can imagine tons of support tickets coming from Linux users who’s particularly DE/Distro permutation isn’t working right.

Still. An App Image would be nice

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#185
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While not trying to recreate the infamous dropbox comment - if you already have Claude code, are on Linux - can't Claude write a cronjob/systemd task that invokes itself for you?

I could write a program that does this of course, but interpreting the current state of Slack threads is not something a Python script will be able to do without involving another LLM. I automated and script what I need or want to automate and script already, but for things like this where understanding of language is useful, I leave it to the slop machine. Things like "this is a holiday in country X but only for peo…

I meant more like:

    0 8 * * 1-5 claude -p "Fetch my unread emails from the last 24 hours, identify urgent items, and provide a bulleted summary." >> ~/desktop/daily_email_summary.txt
(Courtesy of Gemini, not Claude code, as I'm on my phone).

Now, obviously - you might want something a little more elegant; but my point was that if you already grant Claude tool access to your email, slack etc - then it should be trivial to wrap it in a script, and run that from Cron.

I wouldn't do that; I don't trust Claude code with access to my mail (nor would I trust Claude desktop - but I don't use it anyway).

But, if you do trust Claude to read your slack and email, I don't see why Claude code couldn't do this for you almost out of the box?

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#186

I'm still surprised at how many developers still turn their noses up at using Linux. Like... You already use Docker and deploy to K8S... On Linux...

That’s very much not the same thing though?

[dead]

Re: Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux

#189

Hey! I manage the unofficial build at https://github.com/aaddrick/claude-desktop-debian Debian is in the name, but scope has grown to all backends, compositors, etc. The main reason must companies don't publish Linux electron apps is fragmentation. If you're doing anything more than rendering a webpage as an app, it starts to get complicated. I've got a bank of VM's setup for testing, and I still need it up.

> The main reason must companies don't publish Linux electron apps is fragmentation. If you're doing anything more than rendering a webpage as an app, it starts to get complicated. Can confirm. At a past company we worked hard to release a Linux desktop client for our customers who wanted it, even though the number was small. It turns into compatibility hell very fast. You think you can target a couple recent Ubuntu…

I don't have experience with Electron, but... IMO if you compile on something like Ubuntu 20, many applications will work reliably on Ubuntu 20, 22, 24,+, and Debian 2020 editions +. (Assuming same CPU arch as the compiling computer).

Obviously this will probably fail on other distros, but I've found in the past similar groupings. Backwards compatibility is different: I expect a package a compile on Ubuntu 24 not to work on Ubuntu 22.

This is anecdotal, and in the context of rust + EGUI, so I'm not sure how applicable it is to Electron.

I recently hit a Wayland snag: It doesn't support Device Events other than mouse movement. I worked around it by changing to Window events. I could see that being annoying if this substitution weren't acceptable, but it was in this case.

Post reply on HN