Live data from Hacker News

Public Domain Image Archive

pdimagearchive.org

31–35 of 35 posts

Re: Public Domain Image Archive

#31
post #28
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly. The site mentions that and some other problems, and just disclaimers their liability. One problem I didn't see mentioned directly is that some venues have additional bureaucratic rules. For example, I saw a writer-artist complain that they couldn't show the big ebook store proof that they'd licensed the art for their cover, since they painted it themself, and there was no documentation licensing it to them.…

Fwiw, i think wikimedia commons has some really good help pages on what is and is not public domain: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Public_domain https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panora... https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Reuse_of_PD-Art_p... https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:De_minimis Of course sometimes its just a risk trade off, and depends more on how the publishe…

What I'm wondering is -- although an item would be found to be legally considered public domain in all applicable jurisdictions when examined by law clerk -- what are the practical rules for passing copyright clearance checks/challenges by Amazon, Kobo, etc. for public domain art.

You don't want a book's carefully choreographed launch sabotaged by various companies' Kafkaesque bureaucratic processes, while you're trying to finesse the algorithm and the publicity you've scheduled.

(I should've said upfront that I know a bit about public domain and copyright law as a layperson. And I also know that I can't necessarily point a CSR to law surveys if something gets flagged. I need to know the "do X and avoid Y" that is proven to actually work smoothly with all these companies' ideas of "copyright clearance", so that I hopefully never have to talk to a CSR.)

Re: Public Domain Image Archive

#34
post #2

Does anyone know how easily you can do "copyright clearance" for these supposedly public domain images? For example, the page for the first image I clicked on said: Date 1833 Underlying Rights Public Domain Worldwide Digital Rights No Additional Rights * Source states “no known restrictions” * We offer this info as guidance only with a link to: https://pdimagearchive.org/reusing-images/ If, for example, you design th…

Go to the source, it's linked above that metadata. That will be a better resource for its copyright status.

Re: Public Domain Image Archive

#35
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eventually there will be successful copyright lawsuits for derivative images produced by LLMs. Copyright laundering is an illusion.

Delulu take but lets say it goes to court, how would they be able to reproduce the entire process that was used to generate the image aka the training, hardware in the tens of millions, reverse engineering and finding their own training data enough to exactly match the output from the frontier models. How would you order them to reveal their proprietary and protected IP so you can then recreate the exact same model ,…

Most legal tests to date have been on training data rather than generated works, though the number of instances in which training works emerge from prompts of AI LLM engines suggests the latter may also be problematic.

So far there's no binding precedent, but if a work can be shown to be in training data, then there's no need to trace it through the full generative chain as you outline.

See, e.g.: https://astraea.law/insights/ai-training-data-copyright>.

Post reply on HN