Live data from Hacker News

Samurai City

worksinprogress.co

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Samurai City

#51

One thing that I find interesting about this is that "samurai lived in dignified but extreme poverty" but never really did anything to threaten the state and take its riches for themselves for hundreds of years, despite all of them being crammed together with lots of opportunity to organize an enormous rebellion right in the city where the king lived. Perhaps they didn't think of it as poverty. Anyway, great read.

It was likely the kind of poverty where they never had any money, always had debt, but never were in any danger of starvation due to their status. It was just enough to keep them from rebellion but a lot of personal trouble to keep them from too much personal ambition as well.

Re: Samurai City

#52
post #8

A nice article! It really does a great job of describing the hostage nature of keeping the various daimyo in check. One thing that I think is commonly misstated though, is that this period was one of "peace". When viewed from the elite perspective, the power struggles between daimyo in the Warring States Era had subsided, but for the common people, the Edo Period was anything but peaceful. The samurai class could cho…

> The samurai class could chop up any commoner at any time, for any reason, or no reason. This is a pop history misconception. It was always a rare criminal act, and to the extent it did happen, it was specifically more common in the Sengoku era. Article 71 of the Tokugawa Shogunate's 1742 penal code explicitly specifies public execution as the designated penalty for this crime.

> The Kujikata Osadamegaki, promulgated in 1742 under Shogun Tokugawa Yoshimune, embedded hierarchical principles in judicial outcomes by calibrating punishments according to the perpetrator's and victim's social status
Post reply on HN