It reminds me of an incident involving an old colleague of mine at some kind of graduate recruitment fair thing. He walked past a stand which was trying to hire engineers which had some code on the wall when the following exchange happened: Recruiter: Hey there! Do you know what this is? Colleague: Err, … It *looks* like some sort of network protocol Recruiter: No, it’s *COMPUTER CODE*
I wish was a real HTML tag
The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
11–20 of 55 posts
Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#12At least the JavaScript image is excusable since most implementations are made in C++.
Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#13Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#14A clear case of human slop.
Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#15My understanding is that authors often have little or not control over the covers chosen by their publishers.
It's at least possible that the book itself is excellent, but I'm not going to spend $90+ on a hardcover copy to find out.
Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#16Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#17Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#18Its crazy to me how little effort publishers put into the basic parts of their job sometimes. Its even funnier that raymond chen of all people is the one calling this out
Also is this an official Microsoft dev blog? Probably not a good look back at publishing hq
Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#19It reminds me of an incident involving an old colleague of mine at some kind of graduate recruitment fair thing. He walked past a stand which was trying to hire engineers which had some code on the wall when the following exchange happened: Recruiter: Hey there! Do you know what this is? Colleague: Err, … It *looks* like some sort of network protocol Recruiter: No, it’s *COMPUTER CODE*
Re: The back cover of C++: The Language raises questions not answered by front cover
#20fwiw, i stopped keepin up with c++ in 2003. saved my sanity!