Live data from Hacker News

Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

githubstatus.com

21–30 of 50 posts

Re: Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

#22
post #2

One bug after another over at GitHub. What is going on over there?

The migration to Azure. Maybe AI. ¿Por qué no los dos? https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

“Por qué” not “porque”. One means “why” the other “because”.

Re: Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

#23
post #2

One bug after another over at GitHub. What is going on over there?

> "As much as 30% of Microslop's code is now written by artificial intelligence"* *approximately 8% of the above quote has been adjusted to better reflect the impact of the Ai.

rewrite the quote for comic relief or use quotes to signify accuracy to the spoken line .[0]

not both , please.

[0]: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/satya-nadella-says-as-much-a...

Re: Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

#24
post #17

I've been running GitLab internally on k8s for 6 years, it handles code, CI, security scans, build artifacts, helm charts, etc. It runs a nightly backup to a GCS bucket. Monthly upgrades are painless. Once a year the major versions (18 to 19, for example) bump external dependencies and we need about an hour on it. I've been using GitHub for other projects and for the life of me I can't see a single area where its bet…

Gitlab.com used to be slightly less available than GitHub but recently I think the tables have turned and Gitlab saas is relatively stable.

I also enjoy Gitlab as a platform. It's got everything, good board, good repo, good issues, good CI, extremely good registries. It's got the equivalent of gists and pages... It a better product all things considered.

GitHub just wins because of popularity. It's WordPress all over again, the thing people use because it's a thing people use.

Re: Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

#25
post #17

I've been running GitLab internally on k8s for 6 years, it handles code, CI, security scans, build artifacts, helm charts, etc. It runs a nightly backup to a GCS bucket. Monthly upgrades are painless. Once a year the major versions (18 to 19, for example) bump external dependencies and we need about an hour on it. I've been using GitHub for other projects and for the life of me I can't see a single area where its bet…

> I've been using GitHub for other projects and for the life of me I can't see a single area where its better.

Triggering github actions manually is way, way cleaner. Also the pipeline configuration feels cleaner to me bit that might be personal preference more than anything else.. Otherwise I agree. =)

Re: Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

#26
I saw this show up in RSS feed on Slack before here. Interesting, posted a message about it.

Not 2 minutes later, a coworker sent a message saying they got a message: their repository messages couldn't be sent, because the user is no longer authorized. The coworker was worried that they might be fired.

Alas, this economy is a terrible time for one business's fuckups to cause worry about people being fired. That's a lot of stress, man!

If only it were measurable in dollars, then we could sue Microsoft for damages. Maybe then Microsoft might stop producing slop. Ahh, wait. Who am I kidding? No, of course that won't cause Microsoft to stop producing slop.

Re: Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

#29
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "As much as 30% of Microslop's code is now written by artificial intelligence"* *approximately 8% of the above quote has been adjusted to better reflect the impact of the Ai.

rewrite the quote for comic relief or use quotes to signify accuracy to the spoken line .[0] not both , please. [0]: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/satya-nadella-says-as-much-a...

Fair. I added a remark that should make it clear it's not verbatim.
Post reply on HN