31–39 of 39 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who else is atleast attempting to bring chip manufacturing to the US with terafab and that too while using another US companies’ most advanced chip since they will be using Intel’s 14A process. There’s a good chance this brings Intel back from a decline. I’m in full support of humanoid robots and Optimus could be promising. Both SpaceX and Starlink provide a lot of value.
That's what scammers do. They always promise you the Next Big Thing.
> "but it is a trash bag of Musk ventures and crimes" If people really want to take anti-Musk articles seriously, the hyperbole should be controlled. Elon's no saint, but his companies are not a criminal enterprise.
Similarly, when the author says “trash bag”, I don’t take it to mean a literal trash bag.
> "but it is a trash bag of Musk ventures and crimes" If people really want to take anti-Musk articles seriously, the hyperbole should be controlled. Elon's no saint, but his companies are not a criminal enterprise.
Possibly even hundreds of thousands: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-documentary...
"Criminal" is far from the worst label that can legitimately be applied to this man. In fact, every article on Musk and his ventures should be prefaced with a note: "This vocal white supremacist has caused the deaths of thousands of people in third world countries through his reckless and destructive actions."
I think when the histories are written, his legacy will be more Kissinger than Ford.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That one was enough for me. What’s your threshold?
Was it really ment to mimic the fuhrer you think? Who told you that? I think it's a typical propaganda framing technique used to frame someone into a position.
> "but it is a trash bag of Musk ventures and crimes" If people really want to take anti-Musk articles seriously, the hyperbole should be controlled. Elon's no saint, but his companies are not a criminal enterprise.
When the author says “crimes”, I didn’t take it to mean a literal criminal enterprise, but instead casual-speak for something like “bad governance”. It’s like if you saw some bad programming practices and casually called them “programming crimes” to avoid. Similarly, when the author says “trash bag”, I don’t take it to mean a literal trash bag.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Was it really ment to mimic the fuhrer you think? Who told you that? I think it's a typical propaganda framing technique used to frame someone into a position.
Besides other factors: If someone who tweets about individual nazi high command members does a nazi salute, they're doing it for the fuhrer. https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1882406209187409976