Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
41–50 of 130 posts
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#42[flagged]
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#43The crime here seems to be that they used a wrong word - would it have been better if they used "snackable", "irresistible", "enthusiast", or "binge-worthy"?
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#44Maybe trying to engineer addiction is what should be illegal, and if you want to question "how do you define whether something is addictive" you don't need an objective measure: you determine whether it seems like the people making the product seem to think that's their goal.
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess I worded that poorly; it isn't merely that we don't need an objective measure: we literally don't need a measure at all, as the crime would be attempting to cause it, whether or not it was even possible to do, and so we simply do not care if the activity was addictive. If you are going out of your way to exploit the psychology or physiology of other humans in an attempt to use that to sell your product, maybe…
This just shifts the question to: what counts as attempt to cause an addiction? Does writing a book aims to make people read addictive? Try to design a gym class that makes you feel good about yourself so you will come again? You still need to define what is addictive
I don't believe devices are addictive, but that's irrelevant to Satya Nadella believing it and trying to exploit it and thus being a scammer.
It's going to get fuzzy around whether entertaining somebody counts as exploiting their psychology. Obviously it doesn't, but that would rest on reasonably assumed consent.
※ People do get sentenced for attempted fraud, but that's for more blatant things like trying to extract money from an unwitting victim's bank account, rather than just saying "we must figure out how to commit some fraud".
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#46Literally every company on the planet would jump at the chance for their product to be addictive.
No that’s just the goal of bad companies. I work for a company that does not, in fact, want our product to be addictive. We want our product to help people. Stop normalizing this behavior as ‘just business’ and start calling out bad people for what they are.
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
"you know it when you see it"
Shockingly, a huge amount of human behavior cannot be strictly defined and is best evaluated with situational, subjective judgement. Crazy.
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#48Good on Nadella: After expressing his complete disbelief that such a document could have been written, Nadella adds that the elusive and mysterious authors “may want to go work elsewhere.” edit: VP of a product I had not even heard of; it's no Copilot. I would not assume it was on Nadella's radar.
Re: Microsoft Wants to 'Make People Addicted' to Its New AI Assistant
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
What fundamentals are those?
The console market is shrinking and video games are becoming synonymous with PC gaming ( and handhelds I guess but Xbox isn't doing handhelds I think)