I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
jeffgeerling.com
I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
1–10 of 99 posts
Re: I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
#2Jeff Geerling rocks
Re: I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
#3Admittedly, I haven't looked at any open-sourced firmwares either which could have improved things.
I have found the Sispeed USB KVM very useful, the convenience is well worth the $50 it cost me. The UX isn't great but you don't really need it to be. It works (most of the time) via WebUSB for the keyboard mouse.
Re: I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
#4I have a mild distrust of some of the cheap IP KVMs. I don't think vendors are malicious, but I don't expect they get it right every time either. Admittedly, I haven't looked at any open-sourced firmwares either which could have improved things. I have found the Sispeed USB KVM very useful, the convenience is well worth the $50 it cost me. The UX isn't great but you don't really need it to be. It works (most of the t…
I will say iDRAC has been a lot more reliable for me, but the chance I'll ever buy a Dell server for home use is basically 0.
Re: I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
#5Re: I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
#6I have a mild distrust of some of the cheap IP KVMs. I don't think vendors are malicious, but I don't expect they get it right every time either. Admittedly, I haven't looked at any open-sourced firmwares either which could have improved things. I have found the Sispeed USB KVM very useful, the convenience is well worth the $50 it cost me. The UX isn't great but you don't really need it to be. It works (most of the t…
Part of the problem is the absolute crap that most vendors throw on an AST2600 is even worse. I will say iDRAC has been a lot more reliable for me, but the chance I'll ever buy a Dell server for home use is basically 0.
Re: I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
#7Re: I tested every IP KVM in my Homelab
#8How's the video quality/latency on all of these? RDP or parsec are probably the gold standard, but I doubt cheap arm SOCs can implement either properly.
Most employ heavy compression by default, and it looks a little more pronounced with motion. A few have 'high quality' mode, but especially on the Pi-based KVMs this eats up more CPU, so I don't use that.
It's on the whole best for use cases where you just need to log into remote servers and check on things, or reinstall/re-image something. I don't think I'd like using any of these for a constant remote session for daily work. I do use Screen Sharing on macOS for that sometimes, and it works great in its low-latency mode. None of the KVMs I've tested are quite to that level.