Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#12Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#13What is an example of a site with a good llm.txt?
Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#14Does any of the LLM providers actually use llms.txt? If I remember correctly this "standard" was setup by someone but without involvement of any of the major AI players.
All regular pages are aggressively scraped to the extent it's a problem I have to consistently manage, but not llms.txt.
Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#15Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#16Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#17Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#18Does any of the LLM providers actually use llms.txt? If I remember correctly this "standard" was setup by someone but without involvement of any of the major AI players.
I can definitively say llms.txt is not used by any AI players. I run a blogging platform with around 80k blogs and /llms.txt is not requested by anything (other than humans checking to see if there's an llms.txt path). All regular pages are aggressively scraped to the extent it's a problem I have to consistently manage, but not llms.txt.
Re: Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
#19We broke the web so badly for humans that we had to build a clean web for machines, and now humans will have to use machines to experience a clean web again.
I wonder why we broke the web.
It's the law of monetization.