Live data from Hacker News

South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools

discuss.privacyguides.net

41–50 of 177 posts

Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools

#42

The catholic church fought the printing press for hundreds of years. Lets see how long our rulers fight the internet.

The printing press was very much an invention /not/ at the disposal of the citizens. It analogizes poorly to the Internet.

Actually it's perfect. How long did it take rulers to go from fighting the printing press to using it for propaganda and their own ambitions? The internet has just speed run that same course.

Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools

#45

The future is self hosted private invite only communities of vetted real life humans, likely done in person.

And when you need longer reach than that? A “I vouch for this person” system?

That has largely worked for private trackers.

Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools

#46

The future is self hosted private invite only communities of vetted real life humans, likely done in person.

That's pretty much the present today. Tbh I'm fine with the public internet just dying off at this point and people going back to their local smaller scale groups.

Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools

#47
post #6
post #5

[flagged]

Starmer is about as left headed as a straight line railway across Australia. Corbyn was left (maybe). cf. https://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2024 Even if you consider that page biased in whatever way - it's still useful for comparisons on the same scale. E.g. https://www.politicalcompass.org/norway2025

he is objectively left wing. People are over indexing on his controversies instead of looking at his policy platform as a whole. Also take into account that he is in a democracy the leans right on many un-impactful but hot topic issues.

Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools

#48

The future is self hosted private invite only communities of vetted real life humans, likely done in person.

That's pretty much the present today. Tbh I'm fine with the public internet just dying off at this point and people going back to their local smaller scale groups.

[dead]

Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools

#49
The problem is that using an AI censorship tool requires purchasing a solution from a specific vendor. And the deadline is effectively less than a month. There’s nothing particularly unusual about this—South Korea especially has many IT zombie companies that sustain themselves through government contracts. In practice, there’s a local CMS structure in place, and Korean programmers, who are generally weak in English, have to rely on that local CMS, which makes them weak in programming as well. (This is why, despite being a country with a high proportion of highly educated people, South Korea has relatively few prominent programmers.)

South Korea was the first country in the world to implement an internet censorship law. There is a historical record of censorship, regardless of which administration—left or right—was in power.

That said, it’s a complicated issue because these censorship systems also tend to create state IT contracts and job opportunities.

To make things more concrete: most local bulletin board systems and forum platforms are heavily tied to a specific commercial CMS. This is not a coincidence — government-affiliated projects often mandate that CMS, and developers here, lacking both English proficiency and exposure to global open-source alternatives, end up locked into its ecosystem. As a result, even basic AI censorship features become dependent on that vendor’s proprietary modules. When a tight deadline (less than a month) forces a purchase, there’s no room to explore better, cheaper, or more transparent options. The structure itself perpetuates vendor lock-in, weak technical capacity, and a cycle of superficial compliance rather than genuine innovation.

Post reply on HN