South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
41–50 of 177 posts
Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#42The catholic church fought the printing press for hundreds of years. Lets see how long our rulers fight the internet.
The printing press was very much an invention /not/ at the disposal of the citizens. It analogizes poorly to the Internet.
Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#43[flagged]
Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#44Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#45Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#46The future is self hosted private invite only communities of vetted real life humans, likely done in person.
Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#47[flagged]
Starmer is about as left headed as a straight line railway across Australia. Corbyn was left (maybe). cf. https://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2024 Even if you consider that page biased in whatever way - it's still useful for comparisons on the same scale. E.g. https://www.politicalcompass.org/norway2025
Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#48Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#49South Korea was the first country in the world to implement an internet censorship law. There is a historical record of censorship, regardless of which administration—left or right—was in power.
That said, it’s a complicated issue because these censorship systems also tend to create state IT contracts and job opportunities.
To make things more concrete: most local bulletin board systems and forum platforms are heavily tied to a specific commercial CMS. This is not a coincidence — government-affiliated projects often mandate that CMS, and developers here, lacking both English proficiency and exposure to global open-source alternatives, end up locked into its ecosystem. As a result, even basic AI censorship features become dependent on that vendor’s proprietary modules. When a tight deadline (less than a month) forces a purchase, there’s no room to explore better, cheaper, or more transparent options. The structure itself perpetuates vendor lock-in, weak technical capacity, and a cycle of superficial compliance rather than genuine innovation.
Re: South Korean forums will need to scan every images with AI censorship tools
#50[flagged]