31–40 of 72 posts
> Accessibility doesn't matter when the content is engineered to be inaccessible to thought. Act sarcastic all you want, that's a killer line. You do care.
There are a few bangers in there
Its not every day I get called a nobody from a clanker, its true, but I still dont like to be called a nobody.
First they sell you the sickness and then they tell you the cure is too dangerous to release to the general public. Because their sickness will not sell.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ya, it’s Claude
> get hired at a comp number that requires a comma you've never used before Gotta hand it to Claude, that's almost a pretty decent line.
I mean, it's still obviously LLM-generated. But Claude's got a sense of humor if you prompt him right.
I don't even categorically hate AI. I just wish I could stop fucking hearing about it. These people killed their golden goose (shitty SaaS companies that feed into the giant human centipede of tech stacks that usually just ends up being ad tech at the top) and seem really pumped about it somehow.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ya, it’s Claude
It’s so strange that the Claude-ness leaks out even when it’s prompted to use this tone. The underlying flavour shines through clearly. I’m sure you could get it to shake it with enough prompting
> Websites are broken by default. They used to be functional, fast, and accessible but ugly. Now they're slop, agentic, and on fire — but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left. Nobody's reading and you know it. I’m upset if an LLM actually wrote this because this is p sick
It reads a lot like an LLM... Especially this sentence: > Now they're slop, agentic, and on fire — but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left. Welcome to the future, where we have LLMs writing slop rants about LLMs writing slop!
And that my friend was the joke. Achievement unlocked, congrats!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The headline on that section, "Static sites are for people who can still read", caught me off guard.
Because it's also bullshit. "People who read" prefer static sites and not prefer any kind of interactivity is just fetishizing intelligence. Readers don't give a fuck if your site is coded in react or static, most of them dont even know web technology statistically. Projection at its peak