Live data from Hacker News

Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

blog.adafruit.com

241–250 of 300 posts

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI can’t really spell check without risking changing the meaning of sentences. Spell checking was a solved problem before this.

Spellchecking is absolutely not a solved problem. I immediately disable spellchecking on every avenue it tries to approach because managing a bunch of dictionaries on every browser/device/application that has its own spellchecker for some godforsaken reason to not have squigglies spammed over every piece of jargon, slang, and slightly atypical spelling is incredibly annoying. I don't know how effective LLMs are, but…

I can agree that LLMs might yield better results overall than a standard spellchecker.

If your goal is to check your writing for plausibility and rough grammatical correctness, that's certainly an open problem for deterministic, conventionally-written software tools.

My goal with spell checking is to make sure my occasional mechanical typos while using a desktop computer get caught before someone else has the chance to be annoyed by them.

I don't have an issue with using the wrong word entirely when writing at a computer, so that's not a use case I think about. It does happen when I use a smartphone, due to autocorrect and predictive typing, but that's not a case this Claude skill applies to.

So, for my use case, the ~6 orders of magnitude more energy used to send documents over the network to be hyperchurned on an array of GPUs guzzling electricity is pure waste.

It also makes the whole process orders of magnitude _slower_.

I find that massive waste and slowdown infuriating, even while conceding that it can perhaps deliver a little more value then the deterministic spell-checking algorithms I rely on.

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#242
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should read the linked article

I have, and the article does not in any way address my question. You also seem to be a brand new user, so in case you're not aware, HN guidelines say to refrain from mentioning whether or not someone has read the link.

[dead]

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#243

hi everyone, its me 'ladyada. we're very much looking forward to telling our story, i have reached out to the founder of flux.ai (Matthias Wagner - Founder & CEO at Flux), in hopes we can resolve this together and set a good example for the community. looking forward to maybe seeing this resolved on a podcast together, or something

Can we see the demand letter, please?

If not, why not?

My concern here is that this is like a child going to their parents to complain their sibling hit them, only to find out when you ask the sibling that the first one pushed them off their bicycle.

If you don't share it, I think it's a reasonable assumption that you're coming in with unclean hands, trying to use the court of opinion to gain sympathy while denying us the full picture.

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#244

hi everyone, its me 'ladyada. we're very much looking forward to telling our story, i have reached out to the founder of flux.ai (Matthias Wagner - Founder & CEO at Flux), in hopes we can resolve this together and set a good example for the community. looking forward to maybe seeing this resolved on a podcast together, or something

Can we see the demand letter, please? If not, why not? My concern here is that this is like a child going to their parents to complain their sibling hit them, only to find out when you ask the sibling that the first one pushed them off their bicycle. If you don't share it, I think it's a reasonable assumption that you're coming in with unclean hands, trying to use the court of opinion to gain sympathy while denying u…

It seems prudent to me to not assume anything either way until you have more information

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been frustrated with Copilot in this regard. I work on a large C++ codebase, with large files. Human developers jump around between files with the Visual Studio fuzzy search, set breakpoints to trace execution in the Debugger, use the IDE's refactoring tools. Microsoft's answer to this was to just ... expose none of this to their Agent Mode!? Replace the working semantic autocomplete with fucking lies!? Maybe it…

It frustrates me too, it really feels like the next breakthrough will be when someone gets agents working "natively" with LSP on large code-bases. Anthropic added LSP support to claude-code, but the current implementation is worse than useless, because any changes aren't reflected fast enough, so it's constantly working on outdated views / compilation caches, and it gets in a right muddle between its "internal" state…

Oh-my-pi work nice with LSP, better than the others.

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder, is the problem here that LSP is updating too slow all the time? Or just that there’s a chance it will update very slow, and you never really know if you’ll hit that chance, so your model always has to do the “long time wait” just in case? It seems like it ought to be possible for LSP to report that it is still processing, in the latter case, somehow…

I'm not an expert, but my reading of the spec is that LSP can handle generic $notifications, but there isn't a specific standard for readiness reporting beyond "Initialize / Initialized", which isn't suitable for monitoring on-going staleness or readiness post-file-detected change, the spec has that as a single first-time initialization. There are notifications (i.e. `textDocument/didChange` ) that you can send to th…

Staleness of what though?

LSPs only really pro-actively send diagnostics (error/warning/info/suggest[/code action]).

Everything else is responsive; the client asks for symbols in this document, or completion on this line, etc. And if the client is aware of document changes (which are versioned), it should notify of those before requesting new symbols/etc, but that's not difficult.

I don't know that it's mandatory, but I definitely implemented servers so that they would complete processing changed documents before responding to any later requests.

And if it's just the client re-using cached symbols without asking for an update (which should be very fast if nothing has changed); well, that's foolish.

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#247

hi everyone, its me 'ladyada. we're very much looking forward to telling our story, i have reached out to the founder of flux.ai (Matthias Wagner - Founder & CEO at Flux), in hopes we can resolve this together and set a good example for the community. looking forward to maybe seeing this resolved on a podcast together, or something

Can we see the demand letter, please? If not, why not? My concern here is that this is like a child going to their parents to complain their sibling hit them, only to find out when you ask the sibling that the first one pushed them off their bicycle. If you don't share it, I think it's a reasonable assumption that you're coming in with unclean hands, trying to use the court of opinion to gain sympathy while denying u…

Their legal council may have advised them not to publish it at this moment

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#249

hi everyone, its me 'ladyada. we're very much looking forward to telling our story, i have reached out to the founder of flux.ai (Matthias Wagner - Founder & CEO at Flux), in hopes we can resolve this together and set a good example for the community. looking forward to maybe seeing this resolved on a podcast together, or something

Cool to see you on here ladyada, been a big fan since x0xb0x. I've always appreciated your conduct online, and will be cheering for the best possible outcome in this situation for you.

Re: Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

#250
post #27

Never heard of Flux.ai before. It seems to be a 3D circuit designer with 'AI'. Not sure what the issue between them and Adafruit is. However, people over on Reddit¹ claim that Flux.ai is a little bit scummy. They push users into a beginner trial ($5/month) and then silently charge for usage per token - up to $100 per month. Oh, they also claim that they have "the world's largest community-driven public library of Ada…

> Oh, they also claim that they have "the world's largest community-driven public library of Adafruit products, including footprints, symbols, datasheets, and simulation models"². I wonder whether they designed these themselves or whether they use existing ones. Could not easily find licenses info.

Their PCB designs are mostly CC Attribution-ShareAlike typically.

What's funny is that most Adafruit products aren't exactly secret. Most of them have open source schematics and PCB layouts. Even when they aren't, they pretty much just a reference design from a data sheet. The kind of people that have the competence to be using board design software could replicate their designs pretty easily.

Post reply on HN