Live data from Hacker News

Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

moddedbear.com

241–250 of 865 posts

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do people have to go to this, to turn off the AI slop?

is gmail a paid service?

Google can’t spend two decades getting bazillions of people to rely on what’s essentially internet infrastructure at this point, and then pretend their hands aren’t dirty when they suddenly crank the enshittification juicer up to 11 because they need to justify the gobsmscking capex for their largely hated new service. There’s nothing legally stopping them from doing that, but that’s very different than right and wrong.

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#242

> This time I’m doing things the right way by connecting my own domain to a mail host. I’m currently with Fastmail since they were by far the most popular option when I asked for suggestions on the fediverse. Question for the general public: why Fastmail over Proton?

I've used Fastmail for years but a year ago switched to Proton. For me the only reason to switch to Proton was that its hosted within the European continent, while Fastmail is hosted in

I would say that Fastmail is the "Ferrari of e-mail" services. It does everything well, or extremely well, especially if you have more advanced setups like wildcard domains.

In particularly, I miss being able to send from wildcard domains. While proton has a thing called simplelogin, it only works kind of seamlessly if you get an e-mail on a wildcard address and want to reply to that same address. Sending from any * domain requires you to make the address via the simplelogin page and isn't nearly as seamless. While you can make some sending addresses (i.e. regular aliases) in the protonmail interface, that's a trap, because once you've made an alias, you can't delete it unless there's no mail related to it in your mailbox anymore (even if you have a catch-all setup; I wonder if it has anything to do with how the encryption keys are setup, but it still sucks).

I also miss both snoozing and pinning mail. Officially, the proton mail apps (1) do support snoozing, but that requires "conversation view" to be enabled. I think the conversation view over groups e-mails too aggressively, and don't really understand why snoozing without conversation view isn't possible. It's utterly annoying. As far as I know, pinning e-mails isn't a thing in the proton apps. There are "stars" but these could have been labels (which also exist). They don't pin the e-mail to the top.

The proton mobile apps also lack various settings which are in the web interface, like access to sieves. The apps are sometimes a bit laggy, especially if you have a lot of e-mails, although there seem to have been some improvement on this end. I also still get double "fingerprint to unlock" requests sometimes.

Then there's theming, which I can imagine is (even) more of an opinion, but I liked the Fastmail interface more than the proton interface. I think its cleaner. Not a particular fan of any of the themes of protonmail.

I left Fastmail just as it added offline access. This was originally my biggest gripe. I might have stayed longer if they added it just before I left.

For Proton, they have been releasing a lot of new services lately. I hope they will spend a year or more, just polishing what they currently have. They did say they will spend some time on polish in a blogpost recently, but haven't really seen the fruits from this yet (or I care about different things than they do?). And I hope I will one day be able to add more domains to my account. Even with Visionary, you only get 6 domains for 6 users, and no way to add more.

I sincerely hope Proton will never add any of the AI nagging , the OP was talking about. If they do, I'll leave the instant.

(1) https://proton.me/support/snooze-emails

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#243
post #198

Overly aggrieved style of writing. There's some prompts in Gmail to use AI. These are supposedly indictments of the author's writing or intellect? Anyway, the setting is in General and then Cmd-F "smart" and turn everything off.

> the setting is in General and then Cmd-F "smart" and turn everything off.

Once done, users still get the...

    "Press / for Help me write" or 
    "Press / to write using your GMail and Drive"
...prompt, crapped onto every new email. Find the lever to disable that; I dare you.

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#244
post #151

I can appreciate LLMs for some use cases, but writing emails for the user is the one that really baffles me. It's one thing if you don't speak English well and could use some help making yourself understood, but the amount of native speakers using this is so strange to me. How does this help you? If you can write to the LLM telling it what kind of email to write, you might as well just write the email.

If i write a bad email because i'm frustrated to some company or whatever and want them to change their behavour, i think a llm can write an email, which triggers these people a lot more than my 'polite' way of convincing others.

[deleted]

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#245

I find it odd how so many tech involved people here use gmail - are privacy concerns not a concern for them? I moved to mailbox.org years ago. Pay a few pounds a year for private email with webtools and drive and don't have google snooping my emails and sending me targeted ads.

Gmail stopped using email contents for ad targeting in 2017.

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#246
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does Microsoft understand consent? [ ] Yes [ ] Ask again later

Apple does this as well with MacOS update notifications Upgrade to MacOS Tahoe? [ ] Yes [ ] Remind me later

> switch to the Sequoia public beta channel!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47198977#47202707

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#247
post #198

Overly aggrieved style of writing. There's some prompts in Gmail to use AI. These are supposedly indictments of the author's writing or intellect? Anyway, the setting is in General and then Cmd-F "smart" and turn everything off.

Unfortunately, this also turns off the Primary/Promotions/Social/Updates categorization.

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#248
The message they're trying to send is not "we think you're stupid" so much as "we know you hate this, let us make it easier."

The problem is that they don't offer a way for you to say "no, thank you, I'll write my own emails", because they are dumping so much money into this thing and if people don't want to use it they can't justify feeding the token machine.

You can turn a lot of this stuff off by having a Google Cloud account and using their "business-class" product, which gives you the power to turn off these features (most of them, anyway) for your "employees". I'm already doing that because I use Google for a bunch of stuff, but if I wasn't, I might switch away from Gmail as well.

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#249
Yeah none of this is helpful. Even writing in Google docs is inundated with AI in your face features I don't need 99% of the time.

I don't mind the "make this clearer" suggestions in email writing, sometimes that does help me. As long as it stays out of my way like a spell checker, and is optional /opt in.

Re: Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left

#250
post #196

Making a 10 min email/work doc used to take far longer than 10 mins. Now it takes far less. This breaks the built-in guard against wasting people’s time. I wonder if a minor UI change might help a bit: make it normal to show “approx 15 min read” in the email/whatever interface. Just some sort of “this is the baseline amount of work you’re asking of the recipient.”

I actually loathe those "approx whatever time to read" notices for about the same reasons the OP lists. You or your model do not have and can not a clue how fast or slow I read, or, and that is the point, how much time I intend to spend on whatever is up. The mirror is that you cannot know who my recipent is, or what I'm trying to communicate. It is equivalent in this sense. You only [propose to] clutter the already…

I think it’s different when it’s shown to the author, not the reader. It’s basically a word count feature, which has been useful since forever. Except it doesn’t translate into a unit that really means much for this context.

Yes yes yes, it won’t be one size fits all and all those uninteresting “but what if…” points.

What we want is to cue the slop generator just what they’re producing for their coworker or whoever.

I hate getting huge pages of careless slop that the unthinking author probably imagined would look impressive.

Maybe only show it as a result of the user pressing the “generate slop” button. Otherwise it’s not needed for normal, human emails.

Post reply on HN