Live data from Hacker News

HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

hpcalcs.com

31–40 of 140 posts

Re: HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

#34
I'm a lifelong fan of HP calculators. I have a 15c in front of me right now that I've had since the mid-ish 80s. Still works perfectly.

But the 15c 'Collector's Edition' had some issues, and I wonder about the build quality and reliability of this new one, too. Plus: my guess is you can get an original working 16c on eBay for less than this is going to cost.

Honestly, it pains me to say it but I'd recommend a SwissMicros DM16L instead: https://www.swissmicros.com/product/dm16l

Re: HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

#35
post #19

It's always interesting that they use ARM chips to emulate the original firmware.

if that's true, it seems really wasteful honestly. why not reimplement the functionality using a native instruction set rather then emulating some other processor?

That seems extremely efficient to me. That'd be a bad way to build a brand new calculator, perhaps, but the quickest way to get an existing, what, 40 year old?, firmware up and running with the least number of gotchas.

I doubt there are competent and cost-effective engineering teams in existence who could exactly match HP's numeric libraries in a $150 calculator that's guaranteed to sell a tiny number of units.

Re: HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

#36

I'm a lifelong fan of HP calculators. I have a 15c in front of me right now that I've had since the mid-ish 80s. Still works perfectly. But the 15c 'Collector's Edition' had some issues, and I wonder about the build quality and reliability of this new one, too. Plus: my guess is you can get an original working 16c on eBay for less than this is going to cost. Honestly, it pains me to say it but I'd recommend a SwissMi…

Why would that pain you to say it? (Honest question, not leading.)

Re: HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

#37

I'm a lifelong fan of HP calculators. I have a 15c in front of me right now that I've had since the mid-ish 80s. Still works perfectly. But the 15c 'Collector's Edition' had some issues, and I wonder about the build quality and reliability of this new one, too. Plus: my guess is you can get an original working 16c on eBay for less than this is going to cost. Honestly, it pains me to say it but I'd recommend a SwissMi…

Why would that pain you to say it? (Honest question, not leading.)

Because I'm such a longtime fan of HP models.

Re: HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would that pain you to say it? (Honest question, not leading.)

Because I'm such a longtime fan of HP models.

Fair enough!

I have a 50g that I haven't used extensively, and a DM42n here on my desk at work (which I still don't use extensively, but aspire to).

Re: HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

#39
They are doing this also for the science version, the 15C.

I bought a 15C in the 1980s, and have enjoyed it ever since. It is like a rock. Despite being treated roughly over the years, nothing is wrong with it apart from some dents in the metal parts and my name, scratched on the back. I suppose I've replaced the batteries a couple of times, but that's it. This thing just refuses to die.

The main thing is that the keys still work like on day 1. And I've never seen a calculator with keys like this, with such feedback that you never need to worry about double-presses or missed-presses.

I just love the thing. If it died, I'd buy one of these new versions in a flash. But I think it will outlast me!

Re: HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C

#40

They are doing this also for the science version, the 15C. I bought a 15C in the 1980s, and have enjoyed it ever since. It is like a rock. Despite being treated roughly over the years, nothing is wrong with it apart from some dents in the metal parts and my name, scratched on the back. I suppose I've replaced the batteries a couple of times, but that's it. This thing just refuses to die. The main thing is that the ke…

> The main thing is that the keys still work like on day 1. And I've never seen a calculator with keys like this, with such feedback that you never need to worry about double-presses or missed-presses.

This is also the thing I'm most suspicious of with all these retro remakes - it's the physical hardware aspects that get screwed up so often.

If they get this right it would be legitimately surprising.

Post reply on HN