Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

MAI-Thinking-1

microsoft.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 90 posts

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#12

Post by azinman2 »

xavriley wrote: post #7
onlyrealcuzzo wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm interested how much "Clean Data" is synthetic data from "unclean" models...

“ We trained it from the ground up on enterprise grade, clean and commercially licensed data, without distillation from third-party models.”

aka all of GitHub OSS

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#13

Post by ertgbnm »

onlyrealcuzzo wrote: post #6
keeda wrote: post #5

> Second, clean data. MAI-Thinking-1 was trained on clean and appropriately licensed data, with AI-generated content excluded from pre-training. This matters for quality, provenance, and control. If we cannot account for what shaped a model, we cannot fully understand its behavior or credibly improve it. Shots fired? It would be interesting to see how far "clean data" can go on the scaling laws.

I'm interested how much "Clean Data" is synthetic data from "unclean" models...

> with AI-generated content excluded from pre-training.

> without distillation from third-party models

sounds like zero unless they are lying.

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#14

Post by kstenerud »

They've hijacked scrolling. They've hijacked the spacebar. It flickers like crazy when I try to move through the article. Trying to get through it is an exercise in madness.

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#15

Post by vdfs »

keeda wrote: post #5

> Second, clean data. MAI-Thinking-1 was trained on clean and appropriately licensed data, with AI-generated content excluded from pre-training. This matters for quality, provenance, and control. If we cannot account for what shaped a model, we cannot fully understand its behavior or credibly improve it. Shots fired? It would be interesting to see how far "clean data" can go on the scaling laws.

I doubt any lab would say otherwise, they all _claim_ to use licensed data

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#17

Post by AirMax98 »

kstenerud wrote: post #14

They've hijacked scrolling. They've hijacked the spacebar. It flickers like crazy when I try to move through the article. Trying to get through it is an exercise in madness.

I normally don't comment on matters of taste like this, but wow this is brutal. It's like someone threw the site in a vat of molasses.

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#18

Post by zamalek »

ertgbnm wrote: post #13
onlyrealcuzzo wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm interested how much "Clean Data" is synthetic data from "unclean" models...

> with AI-generated content excluded from pre-training. > without distillation from third-party models sounds like zero unless they are lying.

> with AI-generated content excluded from pre-training.

Though this is largely impossible these days, unless they pre-trained on pre-AI era data.

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#19

Post by i_have_an_idea »

pixeldash928 wrote: post #3

Looks like the OAI divergence is finally taking place. Seems like the comparisons are mainly with Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 though. Still, exciting to see a new frontier player.

Is it a frontier player though, or perhaps a new benchmaxxed model? People were saying similar things about Grok but it ultimately amounted to little.

Re: MAI-Thinking-1

#20

Post by t-sauer »

kstenerud wrote: post #14

They've hijacked scrolling. They've hijacked the spacebar. It flickers like crazy when I try to move through the article. Trying to get through it is an exercise in madness.

I do not understand how scroll hijacking is still a thing. Who thinks this is a better experience?
Post reply on HN