Live data from Hacker News

Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

mitmllc.com

71–80 of 200 posts

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#71
Accessibility things should be more useful than to just narrow accessibility uses only. Wheelchair ramps help move heavy objects. The accessibility API makes it possible to introspect all of the keyboard shortcuts an app provides for another app to list them.

Screw Apple and their persnickety, controlling myopia.

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a 15 years old can do so (me) then other people can do so as well. I did not feel uncomfortable at all when i first installed ElementaryOS and then moved to Fedora. everything just works, i never ever had to worry about drivers or stuff like that

As a 15 year old your mind is flexible in ways that most people's are not. As you get older you will realize the cost of changing the way you are used to doing things. Take advantage of your young brain and try all the things

Also, infinite free time to learn, and no real cost to ongoing work by fucking things up

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#73
post #66

macOS already has a dictation feature that does this exact thing, albeit in real time. I use it extensively. OP’s description in the linked article doesn’t say much more than this, so what am I missing with this particular app?

[flagged]

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#74

Some non apple apps get access to accessibility APIs. What gives? This API is sensitive. I imagine Apple is particularly stringent as to how the access is justified. Not how it uses it but how the reason for using it is explained. It's not like someone tests the app and all api calls to deem them reasonable or not.

They do literally pay people to do that. Then one of those people chose to reject this anyway.

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#76
post #67

SpaceGremlin (mac alternative to WinDirStat) has a similar thing, where some features only work in the independent "SpaceGremlinPro" version downloaded from their site. However, they do some cool stuff with licensing - you can point it to the app store paid/installed version, and it detects the license and unlocks. If you're worried about people not trusting payment to you, might be worth seeing if you could implemen…

There is something amusing about the fact that WinDirStat, as far as I know, was based on KDirStat (now QDirStat), yet this doesn't even get mentioned on their Wikipedia page, and by and large a lot of people don't even know QDirStat exists. One time someone even asked me if they knew of a good alternative for Linux; good news!

It is actually mentioned on the Wikipedia page [1] - and of course, you could add it yourself if that's not enough.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinDirStat#Version_history[10]

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#78
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. Changing one's primary operating system takes time, dedication, and is a lifestyle change, similar to moving somewhere remote. Changing ones AC filter is none of those things. If you and your grandma only rely on the computer for its web browser, then good for you. You have flexibility that is not afforded to most people. But that's not how a person's phone works; phones dig a lot deeper into one's lifestyle, int…

Nobody in my life even notices when they change their 'primary operating system.' They buy a phone based on what looks cool at the time, sometimes it's android, sometimes it's iphone. They move freely between chromebooks, windows, and mac os, because everything is online anyway. It's only 'experts' who have trouble with this.

you are telling me that everyone in your life freely swaps between windows and mac without even noticing a difference? no problems?

i call bullshit. i have worked in very big orgs. changing a single icon can cause a deluge of support tickets.

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#79
post #34

In Apple’s defense, your company name is MITM. Man In The Middle certainly falls on one side of the perception line, don’t you think?

The acronym is unfortunate, you're not wrong. MITM here is "Moogle In The Machine" (the Final Fantasy moogle + machine learning), but the security-context joke is fair and I hear it constantly.

Moogle itself might be copyrighted, too

Re: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

#80
post #66

macOS already has a dictation feature that does this exact thing, albeit in real time. I use it extensively. OP’s description in the linked article doesn’t say much more than this, so what am I missing with this particular app?

Apple's built-in dictation works for casual use, but in my own daily use the typo rate was high enough that I was constantly going back to fix things, which defeated the point (with a hand injury, those corrections cost me). WhisperPad uses Whisper models instead, doesn't cut off after 30-60 seconds like Apple's does, supports 99 languages offline, and pastes into any active field via hotkey. There's a 120-minute monthly free tier so you can see if it fits your use case. If Apple's built-in dictation handles what you need, that's a fair answer.
Post reply on HN