Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
nytimes.com
Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
1–10 of 61 posts
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#2Martin Scorsese is backing Black Forest Labs, the company famous for FLUX models.
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#3Martin Scorsese is backing Black Forest Labs, the company famous for FLUX models.
Not to be confused with the other Flux that is currently having a legal dispute with Adafruit.
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#4Easy to do when you're 83 and won't be around to suffer the consequences.
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#5Scorcese understands that Hollywood's ultimate limiting factor is the number of available actors. A finite pool of actors means a finite pool of movies. Removing this limitation means that, just like an AI image generator can generate any image imaginable, a future movie generator will be able to generate every movie imaginable, at the click of a button.
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#6gross
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#7I've noticed a tendency among people who have built careers known for visionary, forward-thinking work that they hesitate to make the natural move into more "conservative" positions/approaches as they age. This leads to missteps, because as one ages, one inevitably becomes further removed from the zeitgeist. On paper, embracing AI might seem like a great idea if you don't want to become an old fogey, but not all changes are positive and I doubt this decision will age well
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#8Scorcese understands that Hollywood's ultimate limiting factor is the number of available actors. A finite pool of actors means a finite pool of movies. Removing this limitation means that, just like an AI image generator can generate any image imaginable, a future movie generator will be able to generate every movie imaginable, at the click of a button.
Wouldn’t that devalue movies, though? For the consumer is great, but for the people in the industry… I guess it doesn’t sound that great?
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#9Scorcese understands that Hollywood's ultimate limiting factor is the number of available actors. A finite pool of actors means a finite pool of movies. Removing this limitation means that, just like an AI image generator can generate any image imaginable, a future movie generator will be able to generate every movie imaginable, at the click of a button.
Why would anyone want that? I don't want infinite movies, I don't have infinite time. I'd rather have intent over quantity. There is already an abundance of content, a century of cinema. Who actually wants this and why?
Re: Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I.
#10Easy to do when you're 83 and won't be around to suffer the consequences.
To me this feels like being edgy on purpose… “Look everybody, I’m still relevant!”