Live data from Hacker News

Chuwi Minibook X

tylercipriani.com

161–170 of 318 posts

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#162
post #99
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A used x1 carbon is a better deal, faster, and weighs about the same with a bigger screen.

"Bigger screen" (i.e. being bigger on the length/width dimension) is a bad thing in this discussion. Some people want a programming/writing laptop that fits in a handbag, so that they don't have to decide to bring it, but can just leave it in their bag the way many people do with an iPad.

Amen. I have a GPD Pocket 4 as my go to because it, a second screen, a 40% keyboard, and the arc mouse all fit in my surprisingly small bag along with chargers, cords, and a bunch of non laptop related stuff (e reader, pens/notebooks, some small tools, a miyoo, etc).

It is, however, an expensive fucking device. $2300 maxed out these days (which I think is $800ish more than i paid. Hurray ram...) or $1400 min specs (which are still quite nice).

I'm glad to see other options at that size (Pocket 4 is 8.8", but my second screen is 10") but a literal quarter of the cost. 80% of what I do on the pocket could be done something like this Minibook, and I don't give a shit if the keyboard/mouse sucks because I've got my own anyways so long as I can tent it.

There will be those days where I might need to do some local heavy lifting and regret not having the Pocket, but I'm also happy to know if it dies on me tomorrow I've got options that aren't shell out another $1k for a tool mostly used for coding.

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A "programming" laptop should be powerful enough to run code, no?

If your code won’t run on this machine, you’re the problem not the machine (outside of niche processor heavy stuff like video editing and ai crap).

Compiling Rust is expensive, for instance.

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#164
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Bigger screen" (i.e. being bigger on the length/width dimension) is a bad thing in this discussion. Some people want a programming/writing laptop that fits in a handbag, so that they don't have to decide to bring it, but can just leave it in their bag the way many people do with an iPad.

Confirmed. Minibooks are amazing in cramped locations (for example, airplane seats), or just to always keep in the bag for support. There's nothing in the market like them, which is a shame - I think a slightly better quality Minibook (Chuwis are plain crap) would be a very solid laptop.

I just responded above, but you might want to look at the GPD Pocket 4.

It is NOT cheap ($1300 min spec) but it's also quite a bit more powerful and with better ports (full size HDMI and Ethernet). It's not for everyone, but it blows my mind how little competition it has given how useful its been for me over the years.

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#165
I loved the Netbook class; the MSI Wind was such a fun device that you could take everywhere. Decent battery, good screen and fantastic keyboard.

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#166
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which windows program are you looking for, specifically?

>Which windows program are you looking for, specifically? All of them, specifically. I don't want to think about which windows program can or can't run with Wine. This includes: * Microsoft software, from MSTeams to Windows itself * Audio production software (DAWs and VST plug-ins) * Games * Device-specific software (like drivers/software for portable thermal printers) * CAD (nTop, only supports Windows, for example,…

I think you missed the point of a netbook.

Aside from Microsoft Office, the rest is workstation stuff, and Microsoft Office is pushing "web first" (at least if their pricing is to be believed, the lowest O365 subscriptions do not offer access to the native apps).

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#167
post #42

Alan Cox had a pre-netbook netbook smaller than a VHS tape at linux.conf.au 2001, and milled about chatting with colleagues and fanboys while his kernel builds scrolled by in the background. Everyone would gawk at the strange little machine. It was Japanese, naturally. At linux.conf.au 2007 we chose a smaller conference bag, designed to carry your electrical accessories and nick-knacks... it turned out to be the perf…

HP used to have extremely small laptops in the early 90s, specifically the omnibook 300 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_OmniBook

The HP LX series (95LX, 100LX, 200LX) is one of my favorites. It also fits the description "smaller than VHS casette"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_95LX

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_200LX

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#168
I just unpacked my eee PC from college after a move. 8gb of RAM and can barely run a very stripped down version of windows 7. Just the thought of writing my final year project on that little machine again is giving me RSI.

I'll stick with my 13" MBP going forward. Netbooks served a purpose but I'm not sure they make much sense anymore

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#169
post #137
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Bigger screen" (i.e. being bigger on the length/width dimension) is a bad thing in this discussion. Some people want a programming/writing laptop that fits in a handbag, so that they don't have to decide to bring it, but can just leave it in their bag the way many people do with an iPad.

Switch to a backpack or just leave the laptop in your car...?

So I would have to buy a car to carry a laptop?

Re: Chuwi Minibook X

#170
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely. Any 2-3 gen old ThinkPad or Elitebook will outlast this and perform lot better. I bought a tablet from this brand few years back. Screen edges were non responsive to touch within months.

my chuwi tablet had the eMMC suddenly die, it disappeared from the point of view of any software, kernel or uefi. the brand is trash.

If it was running Windows - no wonder, Windows is horrible at constantly writing … something to disk, and eMMC's are not high endurance devices. The flash itself had nothing to do with Chuwi and was most likely manufactured by either SanDisk or Kingston, it would have failed likewise in ASUS/Lenovo/whoever else made those crap Intel Atom + 4 GB RAM + 64 GB eMMC devices.
Post reply on HN